Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
438 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

try catch - C++: Throwing a derived class by reference does not work when catching base class

I want to throw my own exceptions with the base class Exception. There is a virtual method print which will be overwritten by the subclasses. I only catch the type Exception& and use print to get the specific error. The problem is that once I throw a reference of a subclass it is trated as if it were the base class.

Here is an example:

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

class Exception
{
    public:
        virtual void print()
        {
            cout << "Exception" << endl;
        }
};

class IllegalArgumentException : public Exception
{
    public:
        virtual void print()
        {
            cout << "IllegalArgumentException" << endl;
        }
};

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
    try
    {
        IllegalArgumentException i;
        Exception& ref = i;

        cout << "ref.print: ";
        ref.print();

        throw ref;
    }
    catch(Exception& e)
    {
        cout << "catched: ";
        e.print();
    }
}

The output of this example is:

ref.print: IllegalArgumentException
catched: Exception

Using a reference should result in the print method from the derived class being used. Inside the try block the reference does use it. Why doesn't the catched Exception& act like an IllegalArgumentException and how can I get that behavior?

The following code seems to do what it is supposed to:

try
{
    IllegalArgumentException i;
    Exception* pointer = &i;

    throw pointer;
}
catch(Exception* e)
{
    cout << "pointer catched: ";
    e->print();
}

but doesn't the pointer become possibly invalid outside the scope of the try block? It would then be risky to do this and if I allocate memory on the heap to get around that problem I have the responsibility for the deletion inside the catch block which isn't pretty either. So how would you solve the problem?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

throw implicitly copies, and consequently slices. Quoting C++11, §15.1/3:

A throw-expression initializes a temporary object, called the exception object, the type of which is determined by removing any top-level cv-qualifiers from the static type of the operand of throw and adjusting the type from “array of T” or “function returning T” to “pointer to T” or “pointer to function returning T”, respectively. The temporary is an lvalue and is used to initialize the variable named in the matching handler. If the type of the exception object would be an incomplete type or a pointer to an incomplete type other than (possibly cv-qualified) void the program is ill-formed. Except for these restrictions and the restrictions on type matching mentioned in 15.3, the operand of throw is treated exactly as a function argument in a call or the operand of a return statement.

I've seen a handful of codebases that work around this by throwing pointers to exceptions rather than objects directly, but personally I'd just reconsider your "need" to do this in the first place.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...