Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
547 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

generics - Why does Java's TreeSet<E> remove(Object) not take an E

From the Java 6 TreeSet<E> Documentation:

boolean remove(Object o):
    Removes the specified element from this set if it is present.

Why does this accept an Object instead of the generic type E? The only objects that can be added are of type E, so it follows that the only removable type should be of type E.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Taking the answer from the first comment posted:

Myth:

A popular myth is that it is stupid and evil, but it was necessary because of backward compatibility. But the compatibility argument is irrelevant; the API is correct whether you consider compatibility or not.

Real reason:

Uniformly, methods of the Java Collections Framework (and the Google Collections Library too) never restrict the types of their parameters except when it's necessary to prevent the collection from getting broken.

Read more here: Why does Set.contains() take an Object, not an E?


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...