Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
947 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

reactjs - Passing state with useContext in Typescript

I'm trying to use the useContext hook to pass state and setState to a child component but I'm getting a ts error when I try and pass [state, setState] in the value argument of the provider. My code is as follows:


export interface IProviderProps {
  children?: any;
}

const initialState = {
  state: Object,
  setState: () => {},
};

export const AppContext = createContext(initialState);

export const AppProvider = (props: IProviderProps) => {
  const [state, setState] = useState([{ isMenuOpen: false, isSideOpen: false }]);

  return <AppContext.Provider value={[state, setState]}>{props.children}</AppContext.Provider>;
};

I'm getting an error on the value variable about the initialState I'm setting.

index.d.ts(290, 9): The expected type comes from property 'value' which is declared here on type 'IntrinsicAttributes & ProviderProps<{ state: ObjectConstructor; setState: () => void; }>'

What do I set the initial state as to allow me to pass the state and useState variables?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

TypeScript infers the AppContext type from initialState given to createContext.

AppContext.Provider expects a value prop, that matches above type. So the type instantiated by createContext determines the context shape, consuming components can use.

What went wrong?

initialState gets following inferred type:

{ state: ObjectConstructor; setState: () => void; }

Passing Object to state means, you expect an ObjectConstructor - not really what you want. With setState: () => {}, components are not able to invoke this function with a state argument. Also note, useState initial value is currently wrapped in an additional array [{...}].

In summary, [state, setState] argument is incompatible to AppContext.Provider value prop.


Solution

Let's assume, your desired state shape looks like:
type AppContextState = { isMenuOpen: boolean; isSideOpen: boolean }
// omitting additional array wrapped around context value
Then an initial state with proper types is (playground):
// renamed `initialState` to `appCtxDefaultValue` to be a bit more concise
const appCtxDefaultValue = {
  state: { isMenuOpen: false, isSideOpen: false },
  setState: (state: AppContextState) => {} // noop default callback
};

export const AppContext = createContext(appCtxDefaultValue);

export const AppProvider = (props: IProviderProps) => {
  const [state, setState] = useState(appCtxDefaultValue.state);

  return (
    // memoize `value` to optimize performance, if AppProvider is re-rendered often 
    <AppContext.Provider value={{ state, setState }}>
      {props.children}
    </AppContext.Provider>
  );
};
A more explicit variant with own context value type (playground):
import { Dispatch, SetStateAction, /* and others */ } from "react";

type AppContextValue = {
  state: AppContextState;
  // type, you get when hovering over `setState` from `useState`
  setState: Dispatch<SetStateAction<AppContextValue>>;
};

const appCtxDefaultValue: AppContextValue = {/* ... */};

Discussing alternatives

Drop context default value completely (playground)

export const AppContext = React.createContext<AppContextValue | undefined>(undefined);

export const AppProvider = (props: IProviderProps) => {
    const [state, setState] = useState({ isMenuOpen: false, isSideOpen: false });
    // ... other render logic
};
To prevent, that a client now has to check for undefined, provide a custom Hook:
function useAppContext() {
    const ctxValue = useContext(AppContext)
    if (ctxValue === undefined) throw new Error("Expected context value to be set")
    return ctxValue // now type AppContextValue
    // or provide domain methods instead of whole context for better encapsulation
}

const Client = () => {
    const ctxVal = useAppContext() // ctxVal is defined, no check necessary!
}

Switch to useReducer and/or custom useAppContext Hook

Consider to replace useState by useReducer and pass the dispatch function down to components. This will provide better encapsulation, as the state manipulation logic is now centralized in a pure reducer and child components cannot manipulate it directly anymore via setState.

Another very good alternative to separate UI Logic from domain logic is to provide a custom useAppContext Hook instead of using useContext(AppContext) - see previous example. Now useAppContext can provide a more narrow API without publishing your whole context.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...