Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
578 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

access modifiers - C# - Improving encapsulation of property in this example?

I know of the error "The accessibility modifier of the set accessor must be more restrictive than the property or indexer". I also know the solution. Just not in this very specific case.

Consider this example:

    internal virtual bool IsFocused
    {
        get
        {
            return isFocused;
        }
        protected set
        {
            isFocused = value;
        }
    }
    private bool isFocused;

It shows the error. I just don't know why. How is "protected" not less accessible than internal? What would be the solution to this problem? I tried putting "internal protected" instead, without luck.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

As it turns out, protected is more accessible than internal. Recall that internal means "not visible outside of this assembly" (except through InternalsVisibleTo access, which makes internal look like public), whereas protected means visible to all subclasses.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...