Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
561 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

version - Incrementing a variable triggers EXIT in bash 4, but not in bash 3

Consider this (exemplary) bash script:

#!/bin/bash -e
errorExit() {
    echo "" >&2
    echo "ERROR (${var_scriptfilename}):" >&2
    echo "An unhandled error occurred." >&2
    intentionalExit 1
}
intentionalExit () {
    trap - EXIT # Unregister the EXIT trap
    exit $1
}
trap errorExit EXIT # Trap script errors
var_scriptfilename="$(basename "$0")"
# ==== START OF TEST ====
var_counter=0
((var_counter++))
echo "var_counter is $var_counter" >&2
# ===== END OF TEST =====
intentionalExit 0

If I run it in Cygwin's bash it produces the intended output:

var_counter is 1

However, if I run it on my Debian Squeeze box, which is its intended destination, I end up in the EXIT trap:

ERROR (test.increment.sh):
An unhandled error occurred.

...Why is that?

If I remove the -e option it works as expected on both systems, but I want to keep -e in use, obviously.

The slightly more cumbersome "universal" variant, var_counter=$(($var_counter+1)), works with -e being set on both shells, but I would prefer to use the first notation (or something similar-looking) since it clearly sticks out as an increment operation when reading the code.

bash --version on the Cygwin bash says:

GNU bash, version 3.2.51(24)-release (i686-pc-cygwin)
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

On Debian, it is:

GNU bash, Version 4.1.5(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

I am intrigued as to why this is that way. Does anybody know the cause of this behavior?

Also, does anybody know of a similar-looking way to increment a variable in bash that I could use?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

From the bash4 manpage on Debian:

((expression))
    The expression is evaluated according  to  the  rules  described
    below  under ARITHMETIC EVALUATION.  If the value of the expres‐
    sion is non-zero, the return status is 0; otherwise  the  return
    status is 1.  This is exactly equivalent to let "expression".

and also ...

-e      Exit  immediately  if a pipeline (which may consist of a
        single simple command),  a subshell command enclosed  in
        parentheses,  or one of the commands executed as part of
        a command list enclosed by  braces  (see  SHELL  GRAMMAR
        above) exits with a non-zero status.

So what is happening is ((var++)) increments var from 0 to 1 and returns 0, causing the overall expression to return non-zero, which triggers errexit.

Now for the difference between the two different bash versions: this change in (( behavior seems to have occurred between 4.0 and 4.1. In 4.0 (( apparently did not trigger errexit. See this NEWS file for the details. You'll have to scroll down to line 135 or so. The Changelog from the source distribution seems to confirm this.

If you just want a variable incremented without using the exit status, there's multiple ways to do it. Maybe some other people could give advice on which is the best, but some possibilities are:

  • var="$((var+1))", the portable POSIX sh method
  • ((var++)) || true, forcing the statement to always have a zero exit status (bash only)

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...