Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
361 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c# - What is the best way for wrapping synchronous code into asynchronous method

I am creating an application with using async-await methods. But There is a large problem for me with using them. After reading few articles I still don't know what is the best way for wrapping my heavy sync operations to async methods.

I have 2 ideas. Which one is the best?

1) Current realization.

private Task<List<UploadedTestModel>> ParseTestFiles(List<string> filesContent)
{
    var tcs = new TaskCompletionSource<List<UploadedTestModel>>();
    Task.Run(() =>
    {
        var resultList = new List<UploadedTestModel>();
        foreach (var testBody in filesContent)
        {
            try
            {
                var currentCulture = Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture;
                var serializerSettings = new JsonSerializerSettings
                {
                    Culture = currentCulture
                };

                var parsedData = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<UploadedTestModel>(testBody, serializerSettings);
                resultList.Add(parsedData);
            }
            catch(Exception exception)
            {
                tcs.SetException(exception);
            }
        }
        tcs.SetResult(resultList);
    });
    return tcs.Task;
}

I'm using Task.Run and TaskCompletionSource

2) Using only Task.Run without TaskCompletionSource

private Task<List<UploadedTestModel>> ParseTestFiles(List<string> filesContent)
{
    return Task.Run(() =>
    {
       . . . .
       return resultList;          
    });
}
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

I would use neither. You'll be lying to whoever invokes your method call. When you expose an async operation, the callers expect it to be naturally asynchronous, meaning there is no thread behind it doing work.

All your methods are inherintly synchronous, and you should expose them as so. Leave it up to the caller to decide if he wants to invoke them synchronously or use a thread and queue it there, don't decide for them.

There is great article called Should I expose asynchronous wrappers for synchronous methods? by Stephan Toub which talks about all the reasons not to do what you're trying to do. I suggest reading it.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...