Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
331 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

javascript - Best way to add a 'callback' after a series of asynchronous XHR calls

I stumbled on a piece of Ajax code that is not 100% safe since it's mixing asynchronous/synchronous type of code... so basically in the code below I have a jQuery.each in which it grabs information on the elements and launch an Ajax get request for each:

$(search).each(function() {
 $.ajax({
  url: 'save.x3?id='+$(this).attr("id")+'value='$(this).data("value");
  success: function(o){
   //Update UI
  },
  error: function(o){
   //Update UI
  }
 });
});

//code to do after saving...

So obviously the 'code to do after saving...' often gets executed before all the requests are completed. In the ideal world I would like to have the server-side code handle all of them at once and move //code to do after saving in the success callback but assuming this is not possible, I changed the code to something like this to make sure all requests came back before continuing which I'm still not in love with:

var recs = [];
$(search).each(function() {
 recs[recs.length] = 'save.x3?id='+$(this).attr("id")+'value='$(this).data("value");
});

var counter = 0;
function saveRecords(){
 $.ajax({
  url: recs[counter],
  success: function(o){
   //Update progress
   if (counter<recs.length){
    counter++;
    saveRecords();
   }else{
    doneSavingRecords();
   }
  },
  error: function(o){
   //Update progress
   doneSavingRecords(o.status);
  }
 });
}

function doneSavingRecords(text){
 //code to do after saving...
}

if (recs.length>0){
 saveRecords();  //will recursively callback itself until a failed request or until all records were saved
}else{
 doneSavingRecords();
}

So I'm looking for the 'best' way to add a bit of synchronous functionality to a series of asynchronous calls ?

Thanks!!

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Better Answer:

function saveRecords(callback, errorCallback){
  $('<div></div>').ajaxStop(function(){
    $(this).remove(); // Keep future AJAX events from effecting this
    callback();
  }).ajaxError(function(e, xhr, options, err){
    errorCallback(e, xhr, options, err);
  });

  $(search).each(function() {
    $.get('save.x3', { id: $(this).attr("id"), value: $(this).data("value") });
  });
}

Which would be used like this:

saveRecords(function(){
   // Complete will fire after all requests have completed with a success or error
}, function(e, xhr, options, err){
   // Error will fire for every error
});

Original Answer: This is good if they need to be in a certain order or you have other regular AJAX events on the page that would affect the use of ajaxStop, but this will be slower:

function saveRecords(callback){
  var recs = $(search).map(function(i, obj) {
   return { id: $(obj).attr("id"), value: $(obj).data("value") };
  });

  var save = function(){
   if(!recs.length) return callback();

   $.ajax({
    url: 'save.x3',
    data: recs.shift(), // shift removes/returns the first item in an array
    success: function(o){
     save();
    },
    error: function(o){
     //Update progress
     callback(o.status);
    }
   });
  }

  save();
}

Then you can call it like this:

saveRecords(function(error){
   // This function will run on error or after all 
   // commands have run
});

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...