Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
573 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

python - sqlalchemy cursor error during yield_per

I am getting the following error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
    main()
    for item in session.query(Item).yield_per(10):
    fetch = cursor.fetchmany(self._yield_per)
    self.cursor, self.context)
    l = self.process_rows(self._fetchmany_impl(size))
    row = self._fetchone_impl()
    self.__buffer_rows()
    self.__rowbuffer = collections.deque(self.cursor.fetchmany(size))
sqlalchemy.exc.ProgrammingError: (ProgrammingError) named cursor isn't valid anymore None None

I am suspect that calling session.commit() is interfering with .yield_per

sessionmaker_ = sessionmaker(autocommit=False, autoflush=False, bind=engine)
session = scoped_session(sessionmaker_)

def foo(item):
  # DO something to the item 
  session.add(item)
  session.commit()

def main():
  for item in session.query(Item).yield_per(5):
    foo(item)

Any idea?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

If you haven't fetched all rows from a DBAPI cursor, then it's usually a bad idea to call commit() on that cursor's connection. In this case psycopg2 (which I'm guessing that's the DBAPI you're on) is not able to maintain the state of a named cursor (which is what it uses when you want server-buffered rows) over the transaction.

One thing you should definitely change here is how frequently you're committing. Ideally you wouldn't commit anything until your entire operation is complete. The Session will automatically flush data as it needs to (well, if you turned on autoflush, which I'd recommend), or you can call flush() to force it, but this is independent of actually committing the transaction. All those calls to commit() will make the operation much less efficient than it has to be, and of course it's getting in the way of the cursor for the other result set. If you just put one commit() at the end of your loop, then you'd solve both issues at once.

If you still need to commit before the entire operation is finished, or even if not, I'd favor working in chunks rather than using yield_per(), which is quite brittle. The recipe at http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/UsageRecipes/WindowedRangeQuery shows one way to do this. DBAPI's are not well suited to dealing with extremely large result sets overall, even though psycopg2 gives us a little more leeway.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...