Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
353 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++ - Boost::process output blank lines

I am developing an application where I need to launch and stop a variety of different executables depending on user input. I would like my "core" program to run as normal whilst these executables run, i.e not wait for their termination which could theoretically be infinte. As well as this I need to be able to receive std_out and send std_in to these executables.

At the moment I have a set up where I have a process manager class:

class ProcessManager {
private:
    std::vector<patchProcess> processList;
    boost::process::group processGroup;
public:
    ProcessManager();
    void addNew(std::string name,std::string command, std::string args);
    void killAll();
    void printAllIn();
};

Where patch process is:

struct patchProcess {
    std::string name;
    boost::process::child *process;
    std::shared_ptr<boost::process::ipstream> procOutStream;
};

Where I can launch / add a new process with the function

void bbefxProcessManager::addNew(std::string name, std::string command, std::string args) {
    LOG(info) << "Creating process for patch " << name;
    patchProcess pp;
    pp.name = name;
    pp.procOutStream = std::shared_ptr<boost::process::ipstream>(new boost::process::ipstream);
    boost::process::child newProc(command,args,processGroup,boost::process::std_out > *pp.procOutStream);
    pp.process = &newProc;
    processList.push_back(pp);
}

And my printing attempts:

void bbefxProcessManager::printAllIn() {
    std::string line;
        for (auto &proc : processList) {
            std::getline(*proc.procOutStream, line);
            std::cout << line << std::endl;
        }
}

This code sucessfully launches the process, however readAllIn gives me a blank output. I have a feeling that I am doing something horribly wrong with std::shared_ptr<boost::process::ipstream> procOutStream;. My rationale behind this is that I am using push_back into my processList (vector of struct), so it should be copyable. I can get the output of a test exec without using the patchProcess struct and these shared pointers but that makes mangement hard / messy. I can also confirm that if I attempt to read the output in the addNew function with something like:

while(true) {
        *pp.procOutStream >> line;
        std::cout << line << std::endl;

    }

I get the output of my executable. So does this hint something is going wrong with copy constructors?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Before your edits, I started doing some work on a truly async approach:

Let's get the formalities out of the way:

#include <boost/asio.hpp>
#include <boost/process.hpp>
#include <boost/process/async.hpp>

namespace ba = boost::asio;
namespace bp = boost::process;

#include <iostream>
#define LOG(x) std::clog

Now lets create a ProcessManager that runs all processes on a single io_service that is shutdown in the destructor.

The IO service is used to schedule all the work (like asynchronous IO). I've

  • randomly decided to focus on line-oriented IO operations
  • decided that there's likely no reason to use more than 1 IO thread, but in case you would ever, there is the strand that correctly synchronizes operations with respect to a child.
#include <map>
#include <list>
#include <thread>
class ProcessManager { // ugh naming smell
    using error_code = boost::system::error_code;
  private:
    ba::io_service _service;
    boost::optional<ba::io_service::work> _keep{_service};
    boost::process::group _group;
    std::thread io_thread;

    struct patchProcess : std::enable_shared_from_this<patchProcess> {
        using ptr = std::shared_ptr<patchProcess>;
        static ptr start(std::string command, std::vector<std::string> args, ProcessManager& mgr) {
            ptr p(new patchProcess(std::move(command), std::move(args), mgr));
            p->output_read_loop();
            return p;
        }

        boost::optional<std::string> getline() {
            std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lk(_mx);
            std::string s;
            if (has_newline(_output.data()) && std::getline(std::istream(&_output), s))
                return s;
            return boost::none;
        }

        void write(std::string message) {
            std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lk(_mx);
            _input_bufs.push_back({false, std::move(message)});

            if (_input_bufs.size() == 1)
                input_write_loop();
        }

        void close_stdin() {
            std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lk(_mx);
            if (_input_bufs.empty()) {
                _strand.post([this, self=shared_from_this()] { _stdin.close(); });
            } else {
                _input_bufs.push_back({true, {}});
            }
        }

        bool is_running() { return _process.running(); }

      private:
        patchProcess(std::string command, std::vector<std::string> args, ProcessManager& mgr)
            : _strand(mgr._service),
              _stdout(mgr._service), _stdin(mgr._service),
              _process(command, args, mgr._group, bp::std_out > _stdout, bp::std_in < _stdin, mgr._service)
        { }

        void output_read_loop() {
            ba::async_read_until(_stdout, pending_output, "
", _strand.wrap([this, self=shared_from_this()](error_code ec, size_t /*transferred*/) {
                if (!ec) {
                    std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lk(_mx);
                    std::ostream(&_output) << &pending_output;
                    output_read_loop();
                }
            }));
        }

        void input_write_loop() { // assumes _mx locked
            if (!_input_bufs.empty()) {
                auto& msg = _input_bufs.front();
                if (msg.eof) {
                    _strand.post([this, self=shared_from_this()] { _stdin.close(); });
                } else {
                    ba::async_write(_stdin, ba::buffer(_input_bufs.front().pay_load), 
                        _strand.wrap([this, self=shared_from_this()](error_code ec, size_t /*transferred*/) {
                            std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lk(_mx);
                            _input_bufs.pop_front();
                            if (!ec)
                                input_write_loop();
                        }));
                }
            }
        }

        ba::io_service::strand _strand; // thread-safe

        // strand-local
        bp::async_pipe _stdout, _stdin;
        bp::child _process;
        ba::streambuf pending_output;

        // mutex protected
        std::mutex mutable _mx;
        struct out_message { bool eof; std::string pay_load; };
        std::list<out_message> _input_bufs; // iterator stability again!
        ba::streambuf _output;

        // static helpers
        template <typename T>
        static bool has_newline(T buffer) {
            return std::find(buffers_begin(buffer), buffers_end(buffer), '
') != buffers_end(buffer);
        }
    };

    using Map = std::map<std::string, patchProcess::ptr>; // iterator stability required!
    Map processList;

    void eventloop() {
        for(;;) try {
            if (!_service.run()) break;
        } catch(std::exception const& e) {
            LOG(error) << "Exception in handler: " << e.what() << "
";
        }
    }
  public:
    ProcessManager() : io_thread([this] { eventloop(); }) { }

    ~ProcessManager() {
        status(__FUNCTION__);
        _keep.reset();
        io_thread.join();
        status(__FUNCTION__);
    }

    void status(std::string const& caption = "Status") const {
        for (auto& p : processList) {
            LOG(info) << caption << ": '" << p.first << "' is " << (p.second->is_running()? "still running":"done") << "
";
        }
    }

    patchProcess::ptr addNew(std::string name, std::string command, std::vector<std::string> args) {
        auto pit = processList.find(name);
        if (pit != processList.end()) {
            if (pit->second->is_running()) {
                LOG(error) << "Process already running ('" << name << "')
";
                return {};
            }
            // TODO make sure process cleaned up etc.
        }
        LOG(info) << "Creating process for patch " << name << "
";
        return processList[name] = patchProcess::start(std::move(command), std::move(args), *this);
    }
};

Demos

The most naive run would be:

int main() {
    ProcessManager pm;
}

Which, predictably returns after doing nothing. Next, we try

int main() {
    ProcessManager pm;
    pm.addNew("sleeper", "/bin/bash", {"-c", "sleep 3" });
}

Which predictably waits 3 seconds before exiting. It prints:

Creating process for patch sleeper
~ProcessManager: 'sleeper' is still running
~ProcessManager: 'sleeper' is done

But WAIT! Didn't you specifically say you didn't want waiting? Well, there is none! You can do whatever you please in the mean time. It's just that ProcessManager's destructor will - by default - wait for the child to finish.

Let's do some IO:

Live On Coliru

int main() {
    ProcessManager pm;

    auto ls  = pm.addNew("listing", "/bin/ls", {"-ltr" });

    boost::optional<std::string> l;

    while ((l = ls->getline()) || ls->is_running()) {
        if (l.is_initialized()) {
            std::cout << "ls: " << std::quoted(*l) << std::endl;
            l.reset();
        }
    }
}

Prints

Creating process for patch listing
ls: "total 172"
ls: "-rw-rw-rw- 1 2001 2000   5645 Feb 11 00:10 main.cpp"
ls: "-rwxr-xr-x 1 2001 2000 162784 Feb 11 00:10 a.out"
~ProcessManager: 'listing' is done
~ProcessManager: 'listing' is done

To really drive the point home that the processes and their IO are synchronous, we can replace

auto ls = pm.addNew("listing", "/bin/ls", {"-ltr" });

with something more time-varied:

auto ls = pm.addNew("listing", "/bin/bash", {"-c", "ls -ltr | while read line; do sleep 1; echo "$line"; done" });

Now, to make it really challenging, let's add another child process and send the output of the ls to the other child:

Live On Coliru

int main() {
    ProcessManager pm;

    auto ls  = pm.addNew("listing", "/bin/bash", {"-c", "ls -ltr | while read line; do sleep 1; echo "$line"; done" });
    auto xxd = pm.addNew("hex encoding", "/usr/bin/xxd", {});

    boost::optional<std::string> l, x;

    bool closed = false;
    while ((l || (l = ls->getline())) || (x || (x = xxd->getline())) || ls->is_running() || xxd->is_running()) {
        if (l.is_initialized()) {
            xxd->write(std::move(*l) + '
');
            l.reset();
            std::cout << "[forwarded from ls to xxd]" << std::endl;
        } else {
            if (!closed && !ls->is_running()) {
                std::cout << "[closing input to xxd]" << std::endl;
                xxd->close_stdin();
                closed = true;
            }
        }

        if (x.is_initialized()) {
            std::cout << std::quoted(*x) << std::endl;
            x.reset();
        }
    }
}

Now, on Coliru the listing is too small to be interesting, but on my system you get output like:

Creating process for patch listing
Creating process for patch hex encoding
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
[forwarded from ls to xxd]
"00000000: 746f 7461 6c20 3733 3635 0a2d 7277 2d72  total 7365.-rw-r"
"00000010: 772d 722d 2d20 2031 2073 6568 6520 7365  w-r--  1 sehe se"
"00000020: 6865 2020 2020 3133 3737 206d 6569 2031  he    1377 mei 1"
"00000030: 3020 2032 3031 3720 636d 616b 655f 696e  0  2017 cmake_in"
"00000040: 7374 616c 6c2e 636d 616b 650a 6c72 7778  stall.cmake.lrwx"
"00000050: 7277 7872 7778 2020 3120 7365 6865 2073  rwxrwx  1 sehe s"
"00000060: 6568 6520 2020 2020 2020 3820 6d65 6920  ehe       8 mei "
"00000070: 3234 2020 3230 3137 206d 6169 6e2e 6370  24  2017 main.cp"
"00000080: 7020 2d3e 2074 6573 742e 6370 700a 2d72  p -> test.cpp.-r"
"00000090: 772d 7277 2d72 2d2d 2020 3120 7365 6865  w-rw-r--  1 sehe"
"000000a0: 2073 6568 6520 2020 2020 3531 3420 7365   sehe     514 se"
"000000b0: 7020 3133 2030 383a 3336 2063 6f6d 7069  p 13 08:36 compi"
"000000c0: 6c65 5f63 6f6d 6d61 6e64 732e 6a73 6f6e  le_commands.json"
"000000d0: 0a2d 7277 2d72 772d 722d 2d20 2031 2073  .-rw-rw-r--  1 s"
"000000e0: 6568 6520 7365 6865 2020 2020 3135 3834  ehe sehe    1584"
"000000f0: 2073 6570 2032 3020 3232 3a30 3320 576f   sep 20 22:03 Wo"
"00000100: 7264 436f 756e 7465 722e 680a 2d72 772d  rdCounter.h.-rw-"
"00000110: 7277 2d72 2d2d 2020 3120 7365 6865 2073  rw-r--  1 sehe s"
"00000120: 6568 6520 2020 2020 3336 3920 7365 7020  ehe     369 sep "
"00000130: 3233 2030 333a 3131 2063 6f6d 6d6f 6e2e  23 03:11 common."
"00000140:

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...