Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
1.0k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

windows - Threading and Thread Safety in C

When there is a common set of global data that needs to be shared among several threaded processes, I typically have used a thread token to protect the shared resource:

enter image description here

Edit - 7/22/15 (to incorporate atomics as a viable option, per Jens comments)

My [First] question is, in C, if I write my routines in such a way as to guarantee each thread accesses one, and only one element of an array:

enter image description here

Is there any reason to think that asynchronous and simultaneous access to different indices of the same unprotected array (as shown in diagram) would be a problem?

Second question: Given that an object that can be accessed as an atomic entity, even in the presence of asynchronous interrupts ( C99 - 7.14 Signal handling ) would using atomics be an effective method for thread protection for an otherwise unprotected variable?

enter image description here

Edit (Clarifications to address questions in comments to this point):
- Specifics for this application:
- Target OS: Windows 7/8/10
- Compiler : C99 compliant (cannot use C11, which include the _Atomic() type specifier )
- H/W : Intel i7 family

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

This (which looks like a C standard of some sort) http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1570.pdf sayeth:

NOTE 1 Two threads of execution can update and access separate memory locations without interfering with each other

NOTE 13 Compiler transformations that introduce assignments to a potentially shared memory location that would not be modified by the abstract machine are generally precluded by this standard, since such an assignment might overwrite another assignment by a different thread in cases in which an abstract machine execution would not have encountered a data race. This includes implementations of data member assignment that overwrite adjacent members in separate memory locations. We also generally preclude reordering of atomic loads in cases in which the atomics in question may alias, since this may violate the "visible sequence" rules.

The way I understand it, this would preclude quamrana's concerns and guarantee you that unprotected writes to separate memory locations should never result in undefined behavior if there is no data race.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...