Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
227 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++ - The direct base class of private inheritance prevents the derived class from defining the object of the indirect base class

like this code

class Try
{
public:
    Try() = default;
    int i = 0;
};

class B1 : private Try
{
public:
    B1() = default;
    using Try::Try();
    using Try::i;
};

class C1 : public B1
{
public:
    Try a; //tell me:'Try' is a private member of 'Try'
    
    void print()
    {std::cout << i << std::endl;}
    //Access to this I is allowed;
};

the Try a is a local object , not a part of C1, why error?

As long as it is a direct base class of private inheritance, can it not be possible to define an indirect base class object in its derived class? Is it because the constructor cannot be used or is it for other reasons?


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

the Try a is a local object , not a part of C1, why error?

By writing Try a; in the context of class C1, the name lookup will generally always scan from local to global scope. The first match thus will be B1::Try, which is, due to the private inheritance, inaccessible for C1.

The fix is easy, just hint the compiler the name you "really" mean, i.e. by writing e.g. ::Try a;.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...