The problem is that this only goes up
one level. So if I have folder1 ->
folder2 -> folder3 -> folder4, and
folder1 is secure. Then folder2 is not
show but folder3 and folder4 are.
You can't recursively walk relationships in predicates because keypaths only describe the relationship between the abstract entities and not the concrete, living managed objects that actually contain the data. An entity graph can be very simple yet generate a vastly complex graph of live objects when populated at runtime. You can't logically capture the complexity of that live graph with a simple keypath.
In this case, you have a Folder
entity which has a relationship to itself called parent
and an attribute of secure
. Therefore, a keypath can only describe at most those two properties with path parent.secure
. You can't create a keypath of parent.parent.secure
because no such relationship actually exists in the entity graph. Such a path only exist sometimes in the live object graph. It would be logically impossible to hard code a path that might or might not exist depending on the particulars of the data at any given time.
This type of situation is where the ability to create customized NSManagedObject subclasses really comes in handy. Your Folder
entites don't have to be just dumb data, you can add behaviors to them so that each object can access its own state and return different data as needed.
In this case, I would recommend adding a transient boolean property named something like hasSecureAncestor
. Then create a custom getter method like:
- (BOOL) hasSecureAncestor{
BOOL hasSecureAncestor=NO;
if (self.parent.secure==kNoSecurity) {
hasSecureAncestor=YES;
}else {
if (self.parent.parent!=nil) {
hasSecureAncestor=self.parent.hasSecureAncestor;
}else {
hasSecureAncestor=NO;
}
}
return hasSecureAncestor;
}
Then just create a predicate to test for "hasSecureAncestor==YES". The custom accessor will walk an arbitrarily deep recursive relationship looking for a secure ancestor.
与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…