Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
472 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

java - Trying to synchronize method within runnable

I have a ConcurrentMap that gets instantiated outside of my runnables, but shared and updated within / accross the runnables. My runnables need to be concurrent, but my concurrentMap update needs to be synchronized to prevent the replacement of previous entrys. Could someone tell me what I'm doing wrong.

public class ExecutionSubmitExample {

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        //Ten concurrent threads
        ExecutorService es = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);

        List<Future<Example>> tasks = new ArrayList<>();

        ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, String> concurrentMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();

        for (int x = 0; x < 10; x++) {
            Example example = new Example(concurrentMap, x);
            Future<Example> future = es.submit(example, example);
            tasks.add(future);
        }

        try {
            for (Future<Example> future : tasks) {
                Example e = future.get();
            }

            for (Entry<Integer,String> obj : concurrentMap.entrySet()) {
                System.out.println("key " + obj.getKey() + " " + obj.getValue());
            }
            es.shutdown();
        } catch (ExecutionException e) {
            throw new RuntimeException(e);
        } catch (InterruptedException ie) {
            throw new RuntimeException(ie);
        }
    }
}

Runnable

public class Example implements Runnable {

    ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, String> concurrentMap;
    private int thread;

    public Example(ConcurrentHashMap<Integer, String> concurrentMap, int thread) {
        this.concurrentMap = concurrentMap;
        this.thread = thread;
    }

    @Override
    public void run() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
            runAnalysis(i);
        }
    }

    public synchronized void runAnalysis(int index) {
        if(concurrentMap.containsKey(index)) {
            System.out.println("contains integer " + index);
        } else {
            System.out.println("put " + index + " thread " + thread);
            concurrentMap.put(index, "thread " + thread);
        }
    }
}

Results - notice index 0 is added multiple times rather than once. It should be added by thread 0 and read as contained by thread 9. I somehow need to lock this method from the other threads until the update has been completed.

put 0 thread 0
put 0 thread 9
put 0 thread 6
put 0 thread 7
put 1 thread 7
put 0 thread 2
put 0 thread 1
put 0 thread 5
put 0 thread 3
put 0 thread 4
contains integer 1
contains integer 1
contains integer 1
contains integer 1
put 2 thread 7
put 1 thread 6
put 1 thread 9
put 1 thread 0
put 0 thread 8
contains integer 2
contains integer 2
contains integer 2
put 2 thread 2
put 2 thread 1
put 2 thread 5
put 2 thread 3
contains integer 1
contains integer 1
contains integer 2
contains integer 2
key 0 thread 8
key 2 thread 3
key 1 thread 0
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

synchronized on the method means synchronized on this object. Since you are creating new objects every time

Example example = new Example(concurrentMap, x);

The synchronization is happening on different objects, so nothing blocks.

You need to synchronized on a shared object or use a shared Lock. These can be passed to the Example object or you can use a static field as suggested by Luiggi. In this case, be careful that the field isn't synchronized on anywhere else or it may interfere with this execution.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...