Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
730 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

d3.js - why does one chart not filter another in dc.js?

I am not able to understand how dc groups chart. So that the change in one filter reflects in all others. I have a simple code with two series charts. When I draw brush on one, it does not filter the other. Not sure why ? Can someone please have a quick look at the small code and suggest.

d3.csv("data/compareData.txt", function(data) {

  ndx = crossfilter(data);
  runDimension = ndx.dimension(function(d) {return [+d3.time.format.iso.parse(d.timestamp), +d.meterid]; });
  frequencyGroup = runDimension.group().reduceSum(function(d) { return +d.frequency; });
  magnitudeGroup = runDimension.group().reduceSum(function(d) { return +d.magnitude; });


 frequencyChart
    .width(768)
    .height(480)
    .chart(function(c) { return dc.lineChart(c).interpolate('basis'); })
    .x(d3.time.scale().domain([1366621166000, 1366621179983]))
    .y(d3.scale.linear().domain([90, 100]))
    .brushOn(true)
    .yAxisLabel("Measured Speed km/s")
    .xAxisLabel("Run")
    .elasticY(true)
    .dimension(runDimension)
    .group(frequencyGroup)
    .mouseZoomable(false)
    .seriesAccessor(function(d) {return +d.key[1];})
    .keyAccessor(function(d) {return +d.key[0];})
    .valueAccessor(function(d) {return +d.value;})
    .legend(dc.legend().x(350).y(350).itemHeight(13).gap(5).horizontal(1).legendWidth(140).itemWidth(70));
  frequencyChart.yAxis().tickFormat(function(d) {return d3.format(',d')(d);});
  frequencyChart.margins().left += 40;

 magnitudeChart
    .width(768)
    .height(480)
    .chart(function(c) { return dc.lineChart(c).interpolate('basis'); })
    .x(d3.time.scale().domain([1366621166000, 1366621179983]))
    .y(d3.scale.linear().domain([90, 100]))
    .brushOn(true)
    .yAxisLabel("Measured Speed km/s")
    .xAxisLabel("Run")
    .elasticY(true)
    .dimension(runDimension)
    .group(magnitudeGroup)
    .mouseZoomable(false)
    .seriesAccessor(function(d) {return  +d.key[1];})
    .keyAccessor(function(d) {return +d.key[0];})
    .valueAccessor(function(d) {return +d.value;})
    .legend(dc.legend().x(350).y(350).itemHeight(13).gap(5).horizontal(1).legendWidth(140).itemWidth(70));
  magnitudeChart.yAxis().tickFormat(function(d) {return d3.format(',d')(d);});
  magnitudeChart.margins().left += 40;

      dc.renderAll();

});
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

You are using the same dimension to group on both charts.

a grouping intersects the crossfilter's current filters, except for the associated dimension's filter. Thus, group methods consider only records that satisfy every filter except this dimension's filter. So, if the crossfilter of payments is filtered by type and total, then group by total only observes the filter by type.

from the crossfilter API doc

One solution is to create a runDimension2 similar to runDimension and do your second chart using this dimension instead.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...