Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
623 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

formatting - How do I format a signed integer to a sign-aware hexadecimal representation?

My initial intent was to convert a signed primitive number to its hexadecimal representation in a way that preserves the number's sign. It turns out that the current implementations of LowerHex, UpperHex and relatives for signed primitive integers will simply treat them as unsigned. Regardless of what extra formatting flags that I add, these implementations appear to simply reinterpret the number as its unsigned counterpart for formatting purposes. (Playground)

println!("{:X}", 15i32);           // F
println!("{:X}", -15i32);          // FFFFFFF1   (expected "-F")
println!("{:X}", -0x80000000i32);  // 80000000   (expected "-80000000")
println!("{:+X}", -0x80000000i32); // +80000000
println!("{:+o}", -0x8000i16);     // +100000
println!("{:+b}", -0x8000i16);     // +1000000000000000

The documentation in std::fmt is not clear on whether this is supposed to happen, or is even valid, and UpperHex (or any other formatting trait) does not mention that the implementations for signed integers interpret the numbers as unsigned. There seem to be no related issues on Rust's GitHub repository either. (Post-addendum notice: Starting from 1.24.0, the documentation has been improved to properly address these concerns, see issue #42860)

Ultimately, one could implement specific functions for the task (as below), with the unfortunate downside of not being very compatible with the formatter API.

fn to_signed_hex(n: i32) -> String {
    if n < 0 {
        format!("-{:X}", -n)
    } else {
        format!("{:X}", n)
    }
}

assert_eq!(to_signed_hex(-15i32), "-F".to_string());

Is this behaviour for signed integer types intentional? Is there a way to do this formatting procedure while still adhering to a standard Formatter?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Is there a way to do this formatting procedure while still adhering to a standard Formatter?

Yes, but you need to make a newtype in order to provide a distinct implementation of UpperHex. Here's an implementation that respects the +, # and 0 flags (and possibly more, I haven't tested):

use std::fmt::{self, Formatter, UpperHex};

struct ReallySigned(i32);

impl UpperHex for ReallySigned {
    fn fmt(&self, f: &mut Formatter) -> fmt::Result {
        let prefix = if f.alternate() { "0x" } else { "" };
        let bare_hex = format!("{:X}", self.0.abs());
        f.pad_integral(self.0 >= 0, prefix, &bare_hex)
    }
}

fn main() {
    for &v in &[15, -15] {
        for &v in &[&v as &UpperHex, &ReallySigned(v) as &UpperHex] {
            println!("Value: {:X}", v);
            println!("Value: {:08X}", v);
            println!("Value: {:+08X}", v);
            println!("Value: {:#08X}", v);
            println!("Value: {:+#08X}", v);
            println!();
        }
    }
}

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...