Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
825 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c++11 - c++ chrono duration_cast to milliseconds results in seconds

I want to have the number of milliseconds since epoch. A popular solution looks like follows (one of the solutions of this question asked here Get time since epoch in milliseconds, preferably using C++11 chrono )

#include <iostream>
#include <chrono>

int main() {
    auto millitime = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::milliseconds>
        (std::chrono::system_clock::now().time_since_epoch()).count();
    std::cout << millitime << std::endl;
    return 0;
}

compiling this with a call to g++ like g++ -std=c++11 main.cpp -o timetest results in the output

1372686001

which is equal to the number of seconds since epoch!

Is this a bug in the glibc? in g++? my mistake?

g++ (Debian 4.7.3-4) 4.7.3
ldd (Debian EGLIBC 2.17-6) 2.17

Update: it works when using the g++ 4.8. So it is a gcc bug?!

g++-4.8 (Debian 4.8.1-2) 4.8.1
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

I think what's happening is that you are compiling with GCC 4.7 but the run-time linker is using the libstdc++.so from a different GCC version, and they are configured with different precision for std::chrono:system_clock. If you use LD_LIBRARY_PATH or suitable linker options to ensure you compile with GCC 4.7 and use its libstdc++.so then the results should be correct.

For example:

$ $HOME/gcc/4.7.1/bin/g++ -std=c++11 t.cc
$ ./a.out
1372693222
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$HOME/gcc/4.7.1/lib64 ./a.out
1372693225128

The difference happens because the call to system_clock::now() is in the libstdc++.so library so the result depends on which library is used at run-time, but the duration_cast conversion from that value to milliseconds is done by inline templates which are instantiated at compile-time. If the compile-time conversion is not consistent with the run-time call then the results are inconsistent.

For GCC 4.8.1 the system_clock implementation was improved to always use the clock_gettime system call if it's available, which was not the case for 4.7, so it consistently uses the high-precision clock no matter how GCC was configured, which probably explains why you don't see the problem with 4.8.1.

You should always ensure the right version of libstdc++.so is used at run-time.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...