Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
3.3k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

Asymmetric Cache Configuration for gem5 ARM bigLITTLE Simulator

I'm writing because I am currently working on a project using the gem5 simulator to simulate an ARM bigLITTLE configuration where the big CPU cluster has an L2 but the little CPU cluster does not. That is, I would like to simulate a system in which the little cores are even simpler than their default configuration. I am running the project using the full system bigLITTLE file (i.e., gem5/configs/example/fs_bigLITTLE.py). Is it possible to configure the system in this way?

My initial thought was to modify the python file so that the little cluster configuration is composed of the following:

class LittleCluster(devices.CpuCluster):
    def __init__(self, system num_cpus, cpu_clock, cpu_voltage="1.0V"):
        cpu_config = [ ObjectList.cpu_list.get("MinorCPU"), devices.L1I, devices.L1D, devices.WalkCache, None]
        super(LittleCluster, self).__init__(system, num_cpus, cpu_clock, cpu_voltage, *cpu_config)

or, in layman's terms, provide None as the SimObject class name for the L2. Unfortunately, as one might expect, this causes the system to crash as the ...

My next idea was to write a new SimObject called EmptyCache that inherits the Cache class from gem5, but does nothing. That is, on every call access to the cache this object would return false, and it would be configured to have no tag, data, or response latency. However, this causes coherence issues with the L1 caches in the little cluster, so I then changed it so that it evicts any cache block that it "hits" before returning false (the following is based on a prior post to the gem5-users mailing list: https://www.mail-archive.com/gem5-users@gem5.org/msg16882.html)

EmptyCache::access(PacketPtr pkt, CacheBlk *&blk, Cycles &lat, PacketList &writebacks)
{
    if (Cache::access(pkt, blk, lat, writebacks) {
        Cache::evictBlock(blk);
    }

    return false;
}

This seems to solve the coherence issues above with the L1 caches, but this seemed to cause coherence issues in the memory bus (which implements the SystemXBar class (which implements the CoherentXBar class)).

At this point, I feel pretty much stuck and would appreciate any advice that you could provide! Thank you!


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)
等待大神解答

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...