I'm doing some unit testing, and mocking some properties using Moq.
Now, this is a Controller test (ASP.NET MVC 3). My Controllers derive from an abstract controller, called AbstractController.
This controller has a dependency on the Http Context (in order to do things like theming, domain-specific logic based on HTTP HOST headers, etc).
This is done via a property called WebSiteSettings:
public abstract class AbstractController : Controller
{
public WebSiteSettings WebSiteSettings { get; private set; }
// other code
}
Notice the private set - the ctor sets it up. So, i changed it to used an interface, and that's what i've mocked:
public IWebSiteSettings WebSiteSettings { get; private set; }
I then created a "FakeWebSiteSettings", which mocks the Http Context in order for it to read the HTTP headers.
The problem is, when i run the test, i get a NotSupportedException:
Invalid setup on a non-virtual (overridable in VB) member: x => x.WebSiteSettings
Here's the relevant mocking code:
var mockWebSiteSettings = new Mock<FakeWebSiteSettings>();
var mockController = new Mock<MyController>(SomeRepository);
mockController.Setup(x => x.WebSiteSettings).Returns(mockWebSiteSettings.Object);
_controller = mockController.Object;
var httpContextBase = MvcMockHelpers.FakeHttpContext();
httpContextBase.Setup(x => x.Request.ServerVariables).Returns(new NameValueCollection
{
{"HTTP_HOST","localhost.www.mydomain.com"},
});
_controller.SetFakeControllerContext(httpContextBase.Object);
If i make the WebsiteSettings
property virtual - the test passes.
But i can't understand why i need to do this. I'm not actually overriding the property, i'm simply mocking how it is setup.
Am i missing something, or doing this wrong?
question from:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5670902/why-does-the-property-i-want-to-mock-need-to-be-virtual