Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
680 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

concurrency - Priority in Go select statement workaround

I wish to have a go routine listening on two channels, blocked when both channels are drained. However, if both channels contains data, I want one to be drained before the other is handled.

In the working example below I wish all out to be drained before exit is handled. I use a select-statement which doesn't have any priority order. How might I get around the problem, making all 10 out-values be handled before the exit?

package main

import "fmt"

func sender(out chan int, exit chan bool){
    for i := 1; i <= 10; i++ {
        out <- i
    } 
    exit <- true
}

func main(){
    out := make(chan int, 10)
    exit := make(chan bool)

    go sender(out, exit)

    L:
    for {
        select {
            case i := <-out:
                fmt.Printf("Value: %d
", i)
            case <-exit:
                fmt.Println("Exiting")
                break L
        }
    }
    fmt.Println("Did we get all 10? Most likely not")
}
question from:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11117382/priority-in-go-select-statement-workaround

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)
package main

import "fmt"

func sender(out chan int, exit chan bool) {
    for i := 1; i <= 10; i++ {
        out <- i
    }
    exit <- true
}

func main() {
    out := make(chan int, 10)
    exit := make(chan bool)

    go sender(out, exit)

    for {
        select {
        case i := <-out:
            fmt.Printf("Value: %d
", i)
            continue
        default:
        }
        select {
        case i := <-out:
            fmt.Printf("Value: %d
", i)
            continue
        case <-exit:
            fmt.Println("Exiting")
        }
        break
    }
    fmt.Println("Did we get all 10? I think so!")
}

The default case of the first select makes it non-blocking. The select will drain the out channel without looking at the exit channel, but otherwise will not wait. If the out channel is empty, it immediately drops to the second select. The second select is blocking. It will wait for data on either channel. If an exit comes, it handles it and allows the loop to exit. If data comes, it goes back up the top of the loop and back into drain mode.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...