java - Comparing a char to a code-point?

Question

What is the "correct" way of comparing a code-point to a Java character? For example:

int codepoint = String.codePointAt(0);
char token = '
';

I know I can probably do:

if (codepoint==(int) token)
{ ... }

but this code looks fragile. Is there a formal API method for comparing codepoints to chars, or converting the char up to a codepoint for comparison?

question from:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1029897/comparing-a-char-to-a-code-point

Answer 1

A little bit of background: When Java appeared in 1995, the char type was based on the original "Unicode 88" specification, which was limited to 16 bits. A year later, when Unicode 2.0 was implemented, the concept of surrogate characters was introduced to go beyond the 16 bit limit.

Java internally represents all Strings in UTF-16 format. For code points exceeding U+FFFF the code point is represented by a surrogate pair, i.e., two chars with the first being the high-surrogates code unit, (in the range uD800-uDBFF), the second being the low-surrogate code unit (in the range uDC00-uDFFF).

From the early days, all basic Character methods were based on the assumption that a code point could be represented in one char, so that's what the method signatures look like. I guess to preserve backward compatibility that was not changed when Unicode 2.0 came around and caution is needed when dealing with them. To quote from the Java documentation:

• The methods that only accept a char value cannot support supplementary characters. They treat char values from the surrogate ranges as undefined characters. For example, Character.isLetter('uD840') returns false, even though this specific value if followed by any low-surrogate value in a string would represent a letter.
• The methods that accept an int value support all Unicode characters, including supplementary characters. For example, Character.isLetter(0x2F81A) returns true because the code point value represents a letter (a CJK ideograph).

Casting the char to an int, as you do in your sample, works fine though.