I found a number of similar questions (e.g. this, that or this), but none of them helped me solve my problem. I have a *.so file (from the core of gnss-sdr) that, as indicated by:
$nm libgnss_system_parameters_dyn.so | c++filt |grep Gps_Eph
contains the symbol Gps_Ephemeris::Gps_Ephemeris()
, which is supposed to be a constructor.
I've written some minimal code:
#include <iostream>
#include <core/system_parameters/gps_ephemeris.h>
int main(int argc,const char* argv[])
{
Gps_Ephemeris ge;
return 0;
}
which I compile with:
g++ main.cpp -std=c++0x -I some_include_path -L some_lib_path -l gnss_system_parameters_dyn`
The linker then complains:
/tmp/ccHCvldG.o: In function `main':
main.cpp:(.text+0x33): undefined reference to `Gps_Ephemeris::Gps_Ephemeris()'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
I also tried cmake, but the line it generated was similar to that (it just added -rdynamic
before linking), and it still generated the exact same linker error.
Note that both the library and my minimal code are being compiled with the same compiler (g++-5), with the exact same flags and the same c++0x standard.
Addressing the answer by Maxim Egorushkin, the line:
nm --demangle --defined-only --extern-only libgnss_system_parameters.so |grep Gps_Eph
doesn't output anything. However, the symbol is defined in the static library (i.e. the *.a library):
00000000000006b0 T Gps_Ephemeris::Gps_Ephemeris()
00000000000006b0 T Gps_Ephemeris::Gps_Ephemeris()
Knowing that both are generated by cmake, in the following way:
add_library(lib_name SHARED ${sources_etc}) #for the *.so
add_library(lib_name_2 ${sources_etc}) #for the *.a
there should be no difference in symbols contained/defined in those libraries, right? I didn't notice anything in cmake's documentation on add_library
. Am I missing something obvious?
question from:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43256459/g-undefined-reference-although-symbol-is-present-in-so-file