Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
250 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

What is wrong with this CSS background syntax?

At this link: [http://codepen.io/FelixKiunke/pen/nvDcj][1] you can see that this guy made a nice circle that finishing filling its edges up every 10 seconds. This is what I want to duplicate.

I have copied the compiled CSS as well as the HTML from this page and put it in some local files. When I open my page with this on it, Chrome tells me that the background CSS elements have invalid syntax and so the circle does not show up at all.

Why is the syntax invalid in my copied code but not on the site?

    /*
    NOTE ABOUT THE FORK:
    This demonstrates the use of radial gradients on the Pie Spinner by HugoGiraudel (http://codepen.io/HugoGiraudel/pen/BHEwo).
    Most of the code is unchanged, too make my changes clear I have removed the previous comments.
    I added radial gradients (see the color change on hover) and a demonstration for the responsive size (click), and a little "Click me" pseudo element.
    */
    * {
      box-sizing: border-box;
    }
    
    .wrapper {
      width: 250px;
      height: 250px;
      margin: 10px auto;
      position: relative;
      background: white;
      /*The bigger size at click:*/
      transition: width 0.5s, height 0.5s;
    }
    .wrapper.big {
      width: 400px;
      height: 400px;
    }
    
    .pie {
      width: 50%;
      height: 100%;
      transform-origin: 100% 50%;
      position: absolute;
      /*
      Here comes the radial gradient.
      Note that it has to have the alignment "left center" for the .filler,
      and "right center" for the .spinner!
      */
    /*CHROME SAYS THE NEXT LINE IS INVALID*/
      background: radial-gradient(left center, circle, #00ccff 0px, #000088 100%);
      /* The borders mustn't be transparent, that looks really ugly! */
      border: 20px solid #024;
    }
    
    .spinner {
      border-radius: 100% 0 0 100% / 50% 0 0 50%;
      z-index: 200;
    /*CHROME SAYS THE NEXT LINE IS INVALID*/
      background: radial-gradient(right center, circle, #00ccff 0px, #000088 100%);
      border-right: none;
      animation: rota 10s linear infinite;
    }
    .spinner::after {
      position: absolute;
      height: 20px;
      top: 0px;
      right: 0px;
      content: "Click me!";
      transform: rotate(270deg);
      transform-origin: 100% 100%;
      color: white;
      font: 16px/20px sans-serif;
    }
    
    .wrapper:hover .pie {
      border-color: #620;
    }
    .wrapper:hover .filler {
    /*CHROME SAYS THE NEXT LINE IS INVALID*/
      background: radial-gradient(left center, circle, #ffbb11 0px, #dd6600 100%);
    }
    .wrapper:hover .spinner {
      background: radial-gradient(right center, circle, #ffbb11 0px, #dd6600 100%);
    }
    
    .filler {
      border-radius: 0 100% 100% 0 / 0 50% 50% 0;
      left: 50%;
      opacity: 0;
      z-index: 100;
      animation: fill 10s steps(1, end) infinite;
      border-left: none;
    }
    
    .mask {
      width: 50%;
      height: 100%;
      position: absolute;
      background: inherit;
      opacity: 1;
      z-index: 300;
      animation: mask 10s steps(1, end) infinite;
    }
    
    @keyframes rota {
      0% {
        transform: rotate(0deg);
      }
      100% {
        transform: rotate(360deg);
      }
    }
    @keyframes mask {
      0% {
        opacity: 1;
      }
      50%, 100% {
        opacity: 0;
      }
    }
    @keyframes fill {
      0% {
        opacity: 0;
      }
      50%, 100% {
        opacity: 1;
      }
    }
    <div class="wrapper">
      <div class="pie spinner"></div>
      <div class="pie filler"></div>
      <div class="mask"></div>
    </div>? 
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

The syntax indeed is incorrect. It should be radial-gradient(circle at right center, #ffbb11 0px, #dd6600 100%). This is also incorrect in the CodePen, and once you fix it, the animation looks different (it has a 'Click here' call-to-action when you hover it). It is not the core issue, though.

The reason why the animation doesn't work at all in your version, is because the animation properties need a -webkit- prefix in Chrome.

In the CodePen, -prefix-free is used, which is why it works. It is a library that automatically adds the prefixed version of the CSS properties. CodePen can also use Autoprefixer (another such library) or neither. Once you select 'neither', you'll see that the CodePen example also doesn't work anymore, because the (S)CSS doesn't contain the required prefixed version for the CSS attributes.

So, the solution: either use a library too, or add the required prefixed attributes for Chrome (and maybe other browsers too).


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

56.9k users

...