There's something I've always felt was a bit of missing functionality in WPF: the ability to use a dynamic resource as the source of a binding. I understand technically why this is--in order to detect changes, the source of a binding has to be a property on a DependencyObject or on an object that supports INotifyPropertyChanged, and a dynamic resource is actually a Microsoft-internal ResourceReferenceExpression which equates to the value of the resource (i.e. it's not an object with a property to bind to, let alone one with change notification)--but still, it's always bugged me that as something that can change during run-time, it should be able to be pushed through a converter as needed.
Well, I believe I've finally rectified this limitation...
Enter DynamicResourceBinding!
Note: I call it a 'Binding' but technically it's a MarkupExtension on which I've defined properties such as Converter, ConverterParameter, ConverterCulture, etc., but which does ultimately use a binding internally (several, actually!) As such, I have named it based on its usage, not its actual type.
But why?
So why would you even need to do this? How about globally scaling your font size based on a user preference while still being able to utilize relative font sizes thanks to a MultiplyByConverter? Or how about defining app-wide margins based simply on a double resource by using a DoubleToThicknessConverter that not only converts it to a thickness, but lets you mask out edges as needed in the layout? Or how about defining a base ThemeColor in a resource, then using a converter to lighten or darken it, or change its opacity depending on usage thanks to a ColorShadingConverter?
Even better, implement the above as MarkupExtensions and your XAML is simplified too!
<!-- Make the font size 85% of what it would normally be here -->
<TextBlock FontSize="{res:FontSize Scale=0.85)" />
<!-- Use the common margin, but suppress the top edge -->
<Border Margin="{res:Margin Mask=1011)" />
In short, this helps consolidate all the 'base values' in your main resources, but be able to tweak them when and where they're used without having to cram 'x' number of variations to them in your resources collection.
The Magic Sauce
The implementation of DynamicResourceBinding is thanks to a neat trick of the Freezable data type. Specifically...
If you add a Freezable to the Resources collection of a FrameworkElement, any dependency properties on that Freezable object which are set as dynamic resources will resolve those resources relative to that FrameworkElement's position in the Visual Tree.
Using that bit of 'magic sauce', the trick is to set a DynamicResource on a DependencyProperty of a proxy Freezable object, add that Freezable to the resource collection of the target FrameworkElement, then set up a binding between the two, which is now allowed, since the source is now a DependencyObject (i.e. a Freezable.)
The complexity is getting the target FrameworkElement when using this in a Style, as a MarkupExtension provides its value where it's defined, not where its result is ultimately applied. This means when you use a MarkupExtension directly on a FrameworkElement, its target is the FrameworkElement as you would expect. However, when you use a MarkupExtension in a style, the Style object is the target of the MarkupExtension, not the FrameworkElement where it's applied. Thanks to the use of a second, internal binding, I've managed to get around this limitation as well.
That said, here's the solution with comments inline:
DynamicResourceBinding
The 'Magic Sauce!' Read the inline comments for what's going on
public class DynamicResourceBindingExtension : MarkupExtension {
public DynamicResourceBindingExtension(){}
public DynamicResourceBindingExtension(object resourceKey)
=> ResourceKey = resourceKey ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(resourceKey));
public object ResourceKey { get; set; }
public IValueConverter Converter { get; set; }
public object ConverterParameter { get; set; }
public CultureInfo ConverterCulture { get; set; }
public string StringFormat { get; set; }
public object TargetNullValue { get; set; }
private BindingProxy bindingSource;
private BindingTrigger bindingTrigger;
public override object ProvideValue(IServiceProvider serviceProvider) {
// Get the binding source for all targets affected by this MarkupExtension
// whether set directly on an element or object, or when applied via a style
var dynamicResource = new DynamicResourceExtension(ResourceKey);
bindingSource = new BindingProxy(dynamicResource.ProvideValue(null)); // Pass 'null' here
// Set up the binding using the just-created source
// Note, we don't yet set the Converter, ConverterParameter, StringFormat
// or TargetNullValue (More on that below)
var dynamicResourceBinding = new Binding() {
Source = bindingSource,
Path = new PropertyPath(BindingProxy.ValueProperty),
Mode = BindingMode.OneWay
};
// Get the TargetInfo for this markup extension
var targetInfo = (IProvideValueTarget)serviceProvider.GetService(typeof(IProvideValueTarget));
// Check if this is a DependencyObject. If so, we can set up everything right here.
if(targetInfo.TargetObject is DependencyObject dependencyObject){
// Ok, since we're being applied directly on a DependencyObject, we can
// go ahead and set all those missing properties on the binding now.
dynamicResourceBinding.Converter = Converter;
dynamicResourceBinding.ConverterParameter = ConverterParameter;
dynamicResourceBinding.ConverterCulture = ConverterCulture;
dynamicResourceBinding.StringFormat = StringFormat;
dynamicResourceBinding.TargetNullValue = TargetNullValue;
// If the DependencyObject is a FrameworkElement, then we also add the
// bindingSource to its Resources collection to ensure proper resource lookup
if (dependencyObject is FrameworkElement targetFrameworkElement)
targetFrameworkElement.Resources.Add(bindingSource, bindingSource);
// And now we simply return the same value as if we were a true binding ourselves
return dynamicResourceBinding.ProvideValue(serviceProvider);
}
// Ok, we're not being set directly on a DependencyObject (most likely we're being set via a style)
// so we need to get the ultimate target of the binding.
// We do this by setting up a wrapper MultiBinding, where we add the above binding
// as well as a second binding which we create using a RelativeResource of 'Self' to get the target,
// and finally, since we have no way of getting the BindingExpressions (as there will be one wherever
// the style is applied), we create a third child binding which is a convenience object on which we
// trigger a change notification, thus refreshing the binding.
var findTargetBinding = new Binding(){
RelativeSource = new RelativeSource(RelativeSourceMode.Self)
};
bindingTrigger = new BindingTrigger();
var wrapperBinding = new MultiBinding(){
Bindings = {
dynamicResourceBinding,
findTargetBinding,
bindingTrigger.Binding
},
Converter = new InlineMultiConverter(WrapperConvert)
};
return wrapperBinding.ProvideValue(serviceProvider);
}
// This gets called on every change of the dynamic resource, for every object it's been applied to
// either when applied directly, or via a style
private object WrapperConvert(object[] values, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture) {
var dynamicResourceBindingResult = values[0]; // This is the result of the DynamicResourceBinding**
var bindingTargetObject = values[1]; // The ultimate target of the binding
// We can ignore the bogus third value (in 'values[2]') as that's the dummy result
// of the BindingTrigger's value which will always be 'null'
// ** Note: This value has not yet been passed through the converter, nor been coalesced
// against TargetNullValue, or, if applicable, formatted, both of which we have to do here.
if (Converter != null)
// We pass in the TargetType we're handed here as that's the real target. Child bindings
// would've normally been handed 'object' since their target is the MultiBinding.
dynamicResourceBindingResult = Converter.Convert(dynamicResourceBindingResult, targetType, ConverterParameter, ConverterCulture);
// Check the results for null. If so, assign it to TargetNullValue
// Otherwise, check if the target type is a string, and that there's a StringFormat
// if so, format the string.
// Note: You can't simply put those properties on the MultiBinding as it handles things differently
// than a single binding (i.e. StringFormat is always applied, even when null.
if (dynamicResourceBindingResult == null)
dynamicResourceBindingResult = TargetNullValue;
else if (targetType == typeof(string) && StringFormat != null)
dynamicResourceBindingResult = String.Format(StringFormat, dynamicResourceBindingResult);
// If the binding target object is a FrameworkElement, ensure the BindingSource is added
// to its Resources collection so it will be part of the lookup relative to the FrameworkElement
if (bindingTargetObject is FrameworkElement targetFrameworkElement
&& !targetFrameworkElement.Resources.Contains(bindingSource)) {
// Add the resource to the target object's Resources collection
targetFrameworkElement.Resources[bindingSource] = bindingSource;
// Since we just added the source to the visual tree, we have to re-evaluate the value
// relative to where we are. However, since there's no way to get a binding expression,
// to trigger the binding refresh, here's where we use that BindingTrigger created above
// to trigger a change notification, thus having it refresh the binding with the (possibly)
// new value.
// Note: since we're currently in the Convert method from the current operation,
// we must make the change via a 'Post' call or else we will get results returned
// out of order and the UI won't refresh properly.
SynchronizationContext.Current.Post((state) => {
bindingTrigger.Refresh();
}, null);
}
// Return the now-properly-resolved result of the child binding
return dynamicResourceBindingResult;
}
}
BindingProxy
