Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
643 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

security - How can I ensure the destruction of a String object in Java?

An empoyee at my company needs to modify data from a SQL Server database through a program I made. The program used Windows authentication at first, and I asked the DBAs to give this specific user write access to said database.

They were not willing to do this, and instead gave write access to my Windows user account.

Since I trust the guy but not enough to let him work 90 minutes with my session open, I'll just add a login prompt to my program, asking for a username and password combination, and log in to SQL Server with it. I'll log in, and trust my application to let him do only what he needs to.

This, however, raises a small security risk. The password fields tutorial over SunOracle's site states that passwords should be kept the minimum amount of time required in memory, and to this end, the getPassword method returns a char[] array that you can zero once you're done with it.

However, Java's DriverManager class only accepts String objects as passwords, so I won't be able to dispose of the password as soon as I'm done with it. And since my application is incidentally pretty low on allocations and memory requirements, who knows how long it'll survive in memory? The program will run for a rather long time, as stated above.

Of course, I can't control whatever the SQL Server JDBC classes do with my password, but I hoped I could control what I do with my password.

Is there a surefire way to destroy/zero out a String object with Java? I know both are kind of against the language (object destruction is non-deterministic, and String objects are immutable), and System.gc() is kind of unpredictable too, but still; any idea?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

So, here's the bad news. i'm surprised no one has mentioned it yet. with modern garbage collectors, even the whole char[] concept is broken. regardless of whether you use a String or a char[], the data can end up living in memory for who-knows-how-long. why is that? because modern jvms use generational garbage collectors which, in short, copy objects all over the place. so, even if you use a char[], the actual memory it uses could get copied to various locations in the heap, leaving copies of the password everywhere it goes (and no performant gc is going to zero out old memory). so, when you zero out the instance you have at the end, you are only zeroing out the latest version in memory.

long story, short, there's no bulletproof way to handle it. you pretty much have to trust the person.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...