Method 1: Basic registering decorator
I already answered this question here: Calling functions by array index in Python =)
Method 2: Sourcecode parsing
If you do not have control over the class definition, which is one interpretation of what you'd like to suppose, this is impossible (without code-reading-reflection), since for example the decorator could be a no-op decorator (like in my linked example) that merely returns the function unmodified. (Nevertheless if you allow yourself to wrap/redefine the decorators, see Method 3: Converting decorators to be "self-aware", then you will find an elegant solution)
It is a terrible terrible hack, but you could use the inspect module to read the sourcecode itself, and parse it. This will not work in an interactive interpreter, because the inspect module will refuse to give sourcecode in interactive mode. However, below is a proof of concept.
#!/usr/bin/python3
import inspect
def deco(func):
return func
def deco2():
def wrapper(func):
pass
return wrapper
class Test(object):
@deco
def method(self):
pass
@deco2()
def method2(self):
pass
def methodsWithDecorator(cls, decoratorName):
sourcelines = inspect.getsourcelines(cls)[0]
for i,line in enumerate(sourcelines):
line = line.strip()
if line.split('(')[0].strip() == '@'+decoratorName: # leaving a bit out
nextLine = sourcelines[i+1]
name = nextLine.split('def')[1].split('(')[0].strip()
yield(name)
It works!:
>>> print(list( methodsWithDecorator(Test, 'deco') ))
['method']
Note that one has to pay attention to parsing and the python syntax, e.g. @deco and @deco(... are valid results, but @deco2 should not be returned if we merely ask for 'deco'. We notice that according to the official python syntax at http://docs.python.org/reference/compound_stmts.html decorators are as follows:
decorator ::= "@" dotted_name ["(" [argument_list [","]] ")"] NEWLINE
We breathe a sigh of relief at not having to deal with cases like @(deco). But note that this still doesn't really help you if you have really really complicated decorators, such as @getDecorator(...), e.g.
def getDecorator():
return deco
Thus, this best-that-you-can-do strategy of parsing code cannot detect cases like this. Though if you are using this method, what you're really after is what is written on top of the method in the definition, which in this case is getDecorator.
According to the spec, it is also valid to have @foo1.bar2.baz3(...) as a decorator. You can extend this method to work with that. You might also be able to extend this method to return a <function object ...> rather than the function's name, with lots of effort. This method however is hackish and terrible.
Method 3: Converting decorators to be "self-aware"
If you do not have control over the decorator definition (which is another interpretation of what you'd like), then all these issues go away because you have control over how the decorator is applied. Thus, you can modify the decorator by wrapping it, to create your own decorator, and use that to decorate your functions. Let me say that yet again: you can make a decorator that decorates the decorator you have no control over, "enlightening" it, which in our case makes it do what it was doing before but also append a .decorator metadata property to the callable it returns, allowing you to keep track of "was this function decorated or not? let's check function.decorator!". And then you can iterate over the methods of the class, and just check to see if the decorator has the appropriate .decorator property! =) As demonstrated here:
def makeRegisteringDecorator(foreignDecorator):
"""
Returns a copy of foreignDecorator, which is identical in every
way(*), except also appends a .decorator property to the callable it
spits out.
"""
def newDecorator(func):
# Call to newDecorator(method)
# Exactly like old decorator, but output keeps track of what decorated it
R = foreignDecorator(func) # apply foreignDecorator, like call to foreignDecorator(method) would have done
R.decorator = newDecorator # keep track of decorator
#R.original = func # might as well keep track of everything!
return R
newDecorator.__name__ = foreignDecorator.__name__
newDecorator.__doc__ = foreignDecorator.__doc__
# (*)We can be somewhat "hygienic", but newDecorator still isn't signature-preserving, i.e. you will not be able to get a runtime list of parameters. For that, you need hackish libraries...but in this case, the only argument is func, so it's not a big issue
return newDecorator
Demonstration for @decorator:
deco = makeRegisteringDecorator(deco)
class Test2(object):
@deco
def method(self):
pass
@deco2()
def method2(self):
pass
def methodsWithDecorator(cls, decorator):
"""
Returns all methods in CLS with DECORATOR as the
outermost decorator.
DECORATOR must be a "registering decorator"; one
can make any decorator "registering" via the
makeRegisteringDecorator function.
"""
for maybeDecorated in cls.__dict__.values():
if hasattr(maybeDecorated, 'decorator'):
if maybeDecorated.decorator == decorator:
print(maybeDecorated)
yield maybeDecorated
It works!:
>>> print(list( methodsWithDecorator(Test2, deco) ))
[<function method at 0x7d62f8>]
However, a "registered decorator" must be the outermost decorator, otherwise the .decorator attribute annotation will be lost. For example in a train of
@decoOutermost
@deco
@decoInnermost
def func(): ...
you can only see metadata that decoOutermost exposes, unless we keep references to "more-inner" wrappers.
sidenote: the above method can also build up a .decorator that keeps track of the entire stack of applied decorators and input functions and decorator-factory arguments. =) For example if you consider the commented-out line R.original = func, it is feasible to use a method like this to keep track of all wrapper layers. This is personally what I'd do if I wrote a decorator library, because it allows for deep introspection.
There is also a difference between @foo and @bar(...). While they are both "decorator expressons" as defined in the spec, note that foo is a decorator, while bar(...) returns a dynamically-created decorator, which is then applied. Thus you'd need a separate function makeRegisteringDecoratorFactory, that is somewhat like makeRegisteringDecorator but even MORE META:
def makeRegisteringDecoratorFactory(foreignDecoratorFactory):
def newDecoratorFactory(*args, **kw):
oldGeneratedDecorator = foreignDecoratorFactory(*args, **kw)
def newGeneratedDecorator(func):
modifiedFunc = oldGeneratedDecorator(func)
modifiedFunc.decorator = newDecoratorFactory # keep track of decorator
return modifiedFunc
return newGeneratedDecorator
newDecoratorFactory.__name__ = foreignDecoratorFactory.__name__
newDecoratorFactory.__doc__ = foreignDecoratorFactory.__doc__
return newDecoratorFactory
Demonstration for @decorator(...):
def deco2():
def simpleDeco(func):
return func
return simpleDeco
deco2 = makeRegisteringDecoratorFactory(deco2)
print(deco2.__name__)
# RESULT: 'deco2'
@deco2()
def f():
pass
This generator-factory wrapper also works:
>>> print(f.decorator)
<function deco2 at 0x6a6408>
bonus Let's even try the following with Method #3:
def getDecorator(): # let's do some dispatching!
return deco
class Test3(object):
@getDecorator()
def method(self):
pass
@deco2()
def method2(self):
pass
Result:
>>> print(list( methodsWithDecorator(Test3, deco) ))
[<function method at 0x7d62f8>]
As you can see, unlike method2, @deco is correctly recognized even though it was never explicitly written in the class. Unlike method2, this will also work if the method is added at runtime (manually, via a metaclass, etc.) or inherited.
Be aware that you can also decorate a class, so if you "enlighten" a decorator that is used to both decorate methods and classes, and then write a class within the body of the class you want to analyze, then methodsWithDecorator will return decorated classes as well as decorated methods. One could consider this a feature, but you can easily write logic to ignore those by examining the argument to the decorator, i.e. .original, to achieve the desired semantics.
