Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
223 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

How do I edit an incorrect commit message in git ( that I've pushed )?

I want to modify a commit message deeper in history and I've pushed many new commits.

How do I change the commit message? Is it possible?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

The message from Linus Torvalds may answer your question:

Modify/edit old commit messages

Short answer: you can not (if pushed).


extract (Linus refers to BitKeeper as BK):

Side note, just out of historical interest: in BK you could.

And if you're used to it (like I was) it was really quite practical. I would apply a patch-bomb from Andrew, notice something was wrong, and just edit it before pushing it out.

I could have done the same with git. It would have been easy enough to make just the commit message not be part of the name, and still guarantee that the history was untouched, and allow the "fix up comments later" thing.

But I didn't.

Part of it is purely "internal consistency". Git is simply a cleaner system thanks to everything being SHA1-protected, and all objects being treated the same, regardless of object type. Yeah, there are four different kinds of objects, and they are all really different, and they can't be used in the same way, but at the same time, even if their encoding might be different on disk, conceptually they all work exactly the same.

But internal consistency isn't really an excuse for being inflexible, and clearly it would be very flexible if we could just fix up mistakes after they happen. So that's not a really strong argument.

The real reason git doesn't allow you to change the commit message ends up being very simple: that way, you can trust the messages. If you allowed people to change them afterwards, the messages are inherently not very trustworthy.


To be complete, you could rewrite your local commit history in order to reflect what you want, as suggested by sykora (with some rebase and reset --hard, gasp!)

However, once you publish your revised history again (with a git push origin +master:master, the + sign forcing the push to occur, even if it doesn't result in a "fast-forward" commit)... you might get into some trouble.

Extract from this other SO question:

I actually once pushed with --force to git.git repository and got scolded by Linus BIG TIME. It will create a lot of problems for other people. A simple answer is "don't do it".


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...