Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
643 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

machine learning - How to calculate optimal batch size

Sometimes I run into a problem:

OOM when allocating tensor with shape

e.q.

OOM when allocating tensor with shape (1024, 100, 160)

Where 1024 is my batch size and I don't know what's the rest. If I reduce the batch size or the number of neurons in the model, it runs fine.

Is there a generic way to calculate optimal batch size based on model and GPU memory, so the program doesn't crash?

In short: I want the largest batch size possible in terms of my model, which will fit into my GPU memory and won't crash the program.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

From the recent Deep Learning book by Goodfellow et al., chapter 8:

Minibatch sizes are generally driven by the following factors:

  • Larger batches provide a more accurate estimate of the gradient, but with less than linear returns.
  • Multicore architectures are usually underutilized by extremely small batches. This motivates using some absolute minimum batch size, below which there is no reduction in the time to process a minibatch.
  • If all examples in the batch are to be processed in parallel (as is typically the case), then the amount of memory scales with the batch size. For many hardware setups this is the limiting factor in batch size.
  • Some kinds of hardware achieve better runtime with speci?c sizes of arrays. Especially when using GPUs, it is common for power of 2 batch sizes to offer better runtime. Typical power of 2 batch sizes range from 32 to 256, with 16 sometimes being attempted for large models.
  • Small batches can offer a regularizing effect (Wilson and Martinez, 2003), perhaps due to the noise they add to the learning process. Generalization error is often best for a batch size of 1. Training with such a small batch size might require a small learning rate to maintain stability because of the high variance in the estimate of the gradient. The total runtime can be very high as a result of the need to make more steps, both because of the reduced learning rate and because it takes more steps to observe the entire training set.

Which in practice usually means "in powers of 2 and the larger the better, provided that the batch fits into your (GPU) memory".

You might want also to consult several good posts here in Stack Exchange:

Just keep in mind that the paper by Keskar et al. 'On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minima', quoted by several of the posts above, has received some objections by other respectable researchers of the deep learning community.

Hope this helps...

UPDATE (Dec 2017):

There is a new paper by Yoshua Bengio & team, Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGD (Nov 2017); it is worth reading in the sense that it reports new theoretical & experimental results on the interplay between learning rate and batch size.

UPDATE (Mar 2021):

Of interest here is also another paper from 2018, Revisiting Small Batch Training for Deep Neural Networks (h/t to Nicolas Gervais), which runs contrary to the larger the better advice; quoting from the abstract:

The best performance has been consistently obtained for mini-batch sizes between m=2 and m=32, which contrasts with recent work advocating the use of mini-batch sizes in the thousands.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...