Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
371 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c - Detecting Endianness

I'm currently trying to create a C source code which properly handles I/O whatever the endianness of the target system.

I've selected "little endian" as my I/O convention, which means that, for big endian CPU, I need to convert data while writing or reading.

Conversion is not the issue. The problem I face is to detect endianness, preferably at compile time (since CPU do not change endianness in the middle of execution...).

Up to now, I've been using this :

#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
...
#else
...
#endif

It's documented as a GCC pre-defined macro, and Visual seems to understand it too.

However, I've received report that the check fails for some big_endian systems (PowerPC).

So, I'm looking for a foolproof solution, which ensures that endianess is correctly detected, whatever the compiler and the target system. well, most of them at least...

[Edit] : Most of the solutions proposed rely on "run-time tests". These tests may sometimes be properly evaluated by compilers during compilation, and therefore cost no real runtime performance.

However, branching with some kind of << if (0) { ... } else { ... } >> is not enough. In the current code implementation, variable and functions declaration depend on big_endian detection. These cannot be changed with an if statement.

Well, obviously, there is fall back plan, which is to rewrite the code...

I would prefer to avoid that, but, well, it looks like a diminishing hope...

[Edit 2] : I have tested "run-time tests", by deeply modifying the code. Although they do their job correctly, these tests also impact performance.

I was expecting that, since the tests have predictable output, the compiler could eliminate bad branches. But unfortunately, it doesn't work all the time. MSVC is good compiler, and is successful in eliminating bad branches, but GCC has mixed results, depending on versions, kind of tests, and with greater impact on 64 bits than on 32 bits.

It's strange. And it also means that the run-time tests cannot be ensured to be dealt with by the compiler.

Edit 3 : These days, I'm using a compile-time constant union, expecting the compiler to solve it to a clear yes/no signal. And it works pretty well : https://godbolt.org/g/DAafKo

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

As stated earlier, the only "real" way to detect Big Endian is to use runtime tests.

However, sometimes, a macro might be preferred.

Unfortunately, I've not found a single "test" to detect this situation, rather a collection of them.

For example, GCC recommends : __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__ . However, this only works with latest versions, and earlier versions (and other compilers) will give this test a false value "true", since NULL == NULL. So you need the more complete version : defined(__BYTE_ORDER__)&&(__BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__)

OK, now this works for newest GCC, but what about other compilers ?

You may try __BIG_ENDIAN__ or __BIG_ENDIAN or _BIG_ENDIAN which are often defined on big endian compilers.

This will improve detection. But if you specifically target PowerPC platforms, you can add a few more tests to improve even more detection. Try _ARCH_PPC or __PPC__ or __PPC or PPC or __powerpc__ or __powerpc or even powerpc. Bind all these defines together, and you have a pretty fair chance to detect big endian systems, and powerpc in particular, whatever the compiler and its version.

So, to summarize, there is no such thing as a "standard pre-defined macros" which guarantees to detect big-endian CPU on all platforms and compilers, but there are many such pre-defined macros which, collectively, give a high probability of correctly detecting big endian under most circumstances.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...