Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
421 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

dependencies - Parallel cumulative (prefix) sums in OpenMP: communicating values between threads

Assume I have a function f(i) which depends on an index i (among other values which cannot be precomputed). I want to fill an array a so that a[n] = sum(f(i)) from i=0 to n-1.

Edit: After a comment by Hristo Iliev I realized what I am doing is a cumulative/prefix sum.

This can be written in code as

float sum = 0;
for(int i=0; i<N; i++) {
    sum += f(i);
    a[i] = sum;
}

Now I want to use OpenMP to do this in parallel. One way I could do this with OpenMP is to write out the values for f(i) in parallel and then take care of the dependency in serial. If f(i) is a slow function then this could work well since the non-paralleled loop is simple.

#pragma omp parallel for
for(int i=0; i<N; i++) {
    a[i] = f(i);
}
for(int i=1; i<N; i++) {
    a[i] += a[i-1];
}

But it's possible to do this without the non-parallel loop with OpenMP. The solution, however, that I have come up with is complicated and perhaps hackish. So my question is if there is a simpler less convoluted way to do this with OpenMP?

The code below basically runs the first code I listed for each thread. The result is that values of a in a given thread are correct up to a constant. I save the sum for each thread to an array suma with nthreads+1 elements. This allows me to communicate between threads and determine the constant offset for each thread. Then I correct the values of a[i] with the offset.

float *suma;
#pragma omp parallel
{
    const int ithread = omp_get_thread_num();
    const int nthreads = omp_get_num_threads();
    const int start = ithread*N/nthreads;
    const int finish = (ithread+1)*N/nthreads;
    #pragma omp single
    {
        suma = new float[nthreads+1];
        suma[0] = 0;
    }
    float sum = 0;
    for (int i=start; i<finish; i++) {
        sum += f(i);
        a[i] = sum;
    }
    suma[ithread+1] = sum;
    #pragma omp barrier
    float offset = 0;
    for(int i=0; i<(ithread+1); i++) {
        offset += suma[i];
    }
    for(int i=start; i<finish; i++) {
        a[i] += offset;
    }
}
delete[] suma;

A simple test is just to set f(i) = i. Then the solution is a[i] = i*(i+1)/2 (and at infinity it's -1/12).

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

You can extend your strategy to an arbitrary number of sub-regions, and reduce them recursively, using tasks:

#include<vector>
#include<iostream>

using namespace std;

const int n          = 10000;
const int baseLength = 100;

int f(int ii) {
  return ii;
}

int recursiveSumBody(int * begin, int * end){

  size_t length  = end - begin;
  size_t mid     = length/2;
  int    sum     = 0;


  if ( length < baseLength ) {
    for(size_t ii = 1; ii < length; ii++ ){
        begin[ii] += begin[ii-1];
    }
  } else {
#pragma omp task shared(sum)
    {
      sum = recursiveSumBody(begin    ,begin+mid);
    }
#pragma omp task
    {
      recursiveSumBody(begin+mid,end      );
    }
#pragma omp taskwait

#pragma omp parallel for
    for(size_t ii = mid; ii < length; ii++) {
      begin[ii] += sum;
    }

  }
  return begin[length-1];
}

void recursiveSum(int * begin, int * end){

#pragma omp single
  {
    recursiveSumBody(begin,end);
  }    
}


int main() {

  vector<int> a(n,0);

#pragma omp parallel
  {
    #pragma omp for
    for(int ii=0; ii < n; ii++) {          
      a[ii] = f(ii);
    }  

    recursiveSum(&a[0],&a[n]);

  }
  cout << n*(n-1)/2 << endl;
  cout << a[n-1] << endl;

  return 0;
}

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...