Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
273 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

Rails: Default sort order for a rails model?

I would like to specify a default sort order in my model.

So that when I do a .where() without specifying an .order() it uses the default sort. But if I specify an .order(), it overrides the default.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

default_scope

This works for Rails 4+:

class Book < ActiveRecord::Base
  default_scope { order(created_at: :desc) }
end

For Rails 2.3, 3, you need this instead:

default_scope order('created_at DESC')

For Rails 2.x:

default_scope :order => 'created_at DESC'

Where created_at is the field you want the default sorting to be done on.

Note: ASC is the code to use for Ascending and DESC is for descending (desc, NOT dsc !).

scope

Once you're used to that you can also use scope:

class Book < ActiveRecord::Base
  scope :confirmed, :conditions => { :confirmed => true }
  scope :published, :conditions => { :published => true }
end

For Rails 2 you need named_scope.

:published scope gives you Book.published instead of Book.find(:published => true).

Since Rails 3 you can 'chain' those methods together by concatenating them with periods between them, so with the above scopes you can now use Book.published.confirmed.

With this method, the query is not actually executed until actual results are needed (lazy evaluation), so 7 scopes could be chained together but only resulting in 1 actual database query, to avoid performance problems from executing 7 separate queries.

You can use a passed in parameter such as a date or a user_id (something that will change at run-time and so will need that 'lazy evaluation', with a lambda, like this:

scope :recent_books, lambda 
  { |since_when| where("created_at >= ?", since_when) }
  # Note the `where` is making use of AREL syntax added in Rails 3.

Finally you can disable default scope with:

Book.with_exclusive_scope { find(:all) } 

or even better:

Book.unscoped.all

which will disable any filter (conditions) or sort (order by).

Note that the first version works in Rails2+ whereas the second (unscoped) is only for Rails3+


So ... if you're thinking, hmm, so these are just like methods then..., yup, that's exactly what these scopes are!
They are like having def self.method_name ...code... end but as always with ruby they are nice little syntactical shortcuts (or 'sugar') to make things easier for you!

In fact they are Class level methods as they operate on the 1 set of 'all' records.

Their format is changing however, with rails 4 there are deprecation warning when using #scope without passing a callable object. For example scope :red, where(color: 'red') should be changed to scope :red, -> { where(color: 'red') }.

As a side note, when used incorrectly, default_scope can be misused/abused.
This is mainly about when it gets used for actions like where's limiting (filtering) the default selection (a bad idea for a default) rather than just being used for ordering results.
For where selections, just use the regular named scopes. and add that scope on in the query, e.g. Book.all.published where published is a named scope.

In conclusion, scopes are really great and help you to push things up into the model for a 'fat model thin controller' DRYer approach.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...