Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
640 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

amazon web services - S3 - What Exactly Is A Prefix? And what Ratelimits apply?

I was wondering if anyone knew what exactly an s3 prefix was and how it interacts with amazon's published s3 rate limits:

Amazon S3 automatically scales to high request rates. For example, your application can achieve at least 3,500 PUT/POST/DELETE and 5,500 GET requests per second per prefix in a bucket. There are no limits to the number of prefixes in a bucket.

While that's really clear I'm not quite certain what a prefix is?

Does a prefix require a delimiter?

If we have a bucket where we store all files at the "root" level (completely flat, without any prefix/delimters) does that count as single "prefix" and is it subject to the rate limits posted above?

The way I'm interpreting amazon's documentation suggests to me that this IS the case, and that the flat structure would be considered a single "prefix". (ie it would be subject to the published rate limits above)

Suppose that your bucket (admin-created) has four objects with the following object keys:

Development/Projects1.xls

Finance/statement1.pdf

Private/taxdocument.pdf

s3-dg.pdf

The s3-dg.pdf key does not have a prefix, so its object appears directly at the root level of the bucket. If you open the Development/ folder, you see the Projects.xlsx object in it.

In the above example would s3-dg.pdf be subject to a different rate limit (5500 GET requests /second) than each of the other prefixes (Development/Finance/Private)?


What's more confusing is I've read a couple of blogs about amazon using the first N bytes as a partition key and encouraging about using high cardinality prefixes, I'm just not sure how that interacts with a bucket with a "flat file structure".

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

You're right, the announcement seems to contradict itself. It's just not written properly, but the information is correct. In short:

  1. Each prefix can achieve up to 3,500/5,500 requests per second, so for many purposes, the assumption is that you wouldn't need to use several prefixes.
  2. Prefixes are considered to be the whole path (up to the last '/') of an object's location, and are no longer hashed only by the first 6-8 characters. Therefore it would be enough to just split the data between any two "folders" to achieve x2 max requests per second. (if requests are divided evenly between the two)

For reference, here is a response from AWS support to my clarification request:

Hello Oren,

Thank you for contacting AWS Support.

I understand that you read AWS post on S3 request rate performance being increased and you have additional questions regarding this announcement.

Before this upgrade, S3 supported 100 PUT/LIST/DELETE requests per second and 300 GET requests per second. To achieve higher performance, a random hash / prefix schema had to be implemented. Since last year the request rate limits increased to 3,500 PUT/POST/DELETE and 5,500 GET requests per second. This increase is often enough for applications to mitigate 503 SlowDown errors without having to randomize prefixes.

However, if the new limits are not sufficient, prefixes would need to be used. A prefix has no fixed number of characters. It is any string between a bucket name and an object name, for example:

  • bucket/folder1/sub1/file
  • bucket/folder1/sub2/file
  • bucket/1/file
  • bucket/2/file

Prefixes of the object 'file' would be: /folder1/sub1/ , /folder1/sub2/, /1/, /2/. In this example, if you spread reads across all four prefixes evenly, you can achieve 22,000 requests per second.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...