Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
670 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

algorithm - Iterative tree walking

It's been quite a while since I took data structures and algorithms in college, so I was surprised recently by a suggestion that recursion may not be the way (tm) to do tree traversal. For some reason iterative, queue based traversal has not been a technique that I've ever used.

What, if any, are the advantages of iterative vs. recursive traversal? In what situations might I use one rather than the other?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

If you are doing a breadth first search the natural implementation is to push nodes into a queue, not to use recursion.

If you are doing a depth first search then recursion is the most natural way to code the traversal. However, unless your compiler optimizes tail recursion into iteration, your recursive implementation will be slower than an iterative algorithm, and will die with a stack overflow on a deep enough tree.

Some quick Python to illustrate the difference:

#A tree is a tuple of an int and a tree. 
t = (1, (2,(4, (6), (7, (9)) )), (3, (5, (8)) ))
def bfs(t):
    to_visit = [t]
    while len(to_visit) > 0:
        c = to_visit[0]
        if type(c) is int:
            print c
        else: 
            print c[0]
            to_visit.append(c[1])
            if len(c) > 2: to_visit.append(c[2])
        to_visit = to_visit[1:]

def dfs(t):
    if type(t) is int:
        print t
        return 
    print t[0]
    dfs(t[1])
    if len(t) > 2: dfs(t[2]) 

bfs(t)
dfs(t)

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...