Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
496 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

undo - What is difference between 'git reset --hard HEAD~1' and 'git reset --soft HEAD~1'?

I tried to undo my commit in git. Is it dangerous to use git reset --hard HEAD~1?

What is the difference between different options for git reset?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

git reset does know five "modes": soft, mixed, hard, merge and keep. I will start with the first three, since these are the modes you'll usually encounter. After that you'll find a nice little a bonus, so stay tuned.


Let's assume you have a repository with a history akin to this:

7e05a95  (HEAD -> main) Update a
e62add5  Update b
ca9ae0a  Update a
9b6060d  Add c
eebe372  Add b
947586a  Add a

Where the latest commit (7e05a95) contains these changes:

diff --git a/a b/a
index b66ba06..28b68e2 100644
--- a/a
+++ b/a
@@ -1 +1 @@
-new content
+new new content

Now what would happen when you run git reset with the various different modes? Let's find out!

soft

When using git reset --soft HEAD~1 you will remove the last commit from the current branch, but the file changes will stay in your working tree. Also the changes will stay on your index, so following with a git commit will create a commit with the exact same changes as the commit you "removed" before.

How would this look like in practice? Like this:

> git reset --soft HEAD^ # Assuming HEAD points at 7e05a95
> git status
On branch main
Changes to be committed:
  (use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
    modified:   a

As you see the changes in file a are on the index, and ready to be committed again.

mixed

This is the default mode and quite similar to soft. When "removing" a commit with git reset HEAD~1 you will still keep the changes in your working tree but not on the index; so if you want to "redo" the commit, you will have to add the changes (git add) before commiting.

In practice the result might look like this:

> git reset --mixed HEAD^ # Assuming HEAD points at 7e05a95
> git status
On branch main
Changes not staged for commit:
  (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
  (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
    modified:   a

no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

The changes of file a are still there but they're not on the index.

hard

When using git reset --hard HEAD~1 you will lose all uncommited changes and all untracked files in addition to the changes introduced in the last commit. The changes won't stay in your working tree so doing a git status command will tell you that you don't have any changes in your repository.

Tread carefully with this one. If you accidentally remove uncommited changes which were never tracked by git (speak: committed or at least added to the index), you have no way of getting them back using git.

A practical example might look like this:

> git reset --hard HEAD^ # Assuming HEAD points at 7e05a95
> git status
On branch main
nothing to commit, working tree clean

As you can see, no changes remain. Assuming you also had some uncommitted changes in the file b these would be lost too!

> echo 'some uncommitted changes' > b
> git status
On branch main
Changes not staged for commit:
  (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
  (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
    modified:   b

no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

> git reset --hard HEAD^ # Assuming HEAD points at 7e05a95
> git status
On branch main
nothing to commit, working tree clean

Bonus

keep

git reset --keep HEAD~1 is an interesting and useful one. It only resets the files which are different between the current HEAD and the given commit. It aborts the reset if one or more of these files has uncommited changes. It basically acts as a safer version of hard.

Let's revisit the example from before, where you had some uncommitted changes in b:

> echo 'some uncommitted changes' > b
> git status
On branch main
Changes not staged for commit:
  (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
  (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
    modified:   b

no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

> git reset --keep HEAD^ # Assuming HEAD points at 7e05a95
> git status
On branch main
Changes not staged for commit:
  (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
  (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
    modified:   b

no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")

You removed the changes in file a but retained the uncommitted changes in file b!

So to reiterate: "hard" will remove all changes while "keep" only removes changes from the reset commit(s).


Each of these modes is explained in depths in the git reset documentation.

Note
When doing git reset to remove a commit the commit isn't really lost, there just is no reference pointing to it or any of it's children. You can still recover a commit which was "deleted" with git reset by finding it's SHA-1 key, for example with a command such as git reflog.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...