Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
383 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

parallel execution of random forest in R

I am running random forest in R in parallel

library(doMC)
registerDoMC()
x <- matrix(runif(500), 100)
y <- gl(2, 50)

Parallel execution (took 73 sec)

rf <- foreach(ntree=rep(25000, 6), .combine=combine, .packages='randomForest') %dopar%
randomForest(x, y, ntree=ntree) 

Sequential execution (took 82 sec)

rf <- foreach(ntree=rep(25000, 6), .combine=combine) %do%
randomForest(x, y, ntree=ntree) 

In parallel execution, the tree generation is pretty quick like 3-7 sec, but the rest of the time is consumed in combining the results (combine option). So, its only worth to run parallel execution is the number of trees are really high. Is there any way I can tweak "combine" option to avoid any calculation at each node which I dont need and make it more faster

PS. Above is just an example of data. In real I have some 100 thousands features for some 100 observations.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Setting .multicombine to TRUE can make a significant difference:

rf <- foreach(ntree=rep(25000, 6), .combine=randomForest::combine,
              .multicombine=TRUE, .packages='randomForest') %dopar% {
    randomForest(x, y, ntree=ntree)
}

This causes combine to be called once rather than five times. On my desktop machine, this runs in 8 seconds rather than 19 seconds.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...