Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
354 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c - How to ensure a dynamically allocated array is private in openmp

I'm working in C with openMP using gcc on a linux machine. In an openmp parallel for loop, I can declare a statically allocated array as private. Consider the code fragment:

int a[10];
#pragma omp parallel for shared(none) firstprivate(a)
for(i=0;i<4;i++){

And everything works as expected. But if instead I allocate a dynamically,

int * a = (int *) malloc(10*sizeof(int));
#pragma omp parallel for shared(none) firstprivate(a)

the values of a (at least a[1...9]) are not protected but act as if they are shared. This is understandable as nothing in the pragma command seems to tell omp how big the array a is that needs to be private. How can I pass this information to openmp? How do I declare the entire the dynamically allocated array as private?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

I don't think you do - what I did to solve this problem was used a parallel region #pragma omp parallel shared(...) private(...) and allocated the array dynamically inside the parallel region. Try this:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <malloc.h>

/* compile with gcc -o test2 -fopenmp test2.c */

int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
    int i = 0;
    int size = 20;
    int* a = (int*) calloc(size, sizeof(int));
    int* b = (int*) calloc(size, sizeof(int));
    int* c;

    for ( i = 0; i < size; i++ )
    {
        a[i] = i;
        b[i] = size-i;
        printf("[BEFORE] At %d: a=%d, b=%d
", i, a[i], b[i]);
    }

    #pragma omp parallel shared(a,b) private(c,i)
    {
        c = (int*) calloc(3, sizeof(int));

        #pragma omp for
        for ( i = 0; i < size; i++ )
        {
            c[0] = 5*a[i];
            c[1] = 2*b[i];
            c[2] = -2*i;
            a[i] = c[0]+c[1]+c[2];

            c[0] = 4*a[i];
            c[1] = -1*b[i];
            c[2] = i;
            b[i] = c[0]+c[1]+c[2];
        }

        free(c);
    }

    for ( i = 0; i < size; i++ )
    {
        printf("[AFTER] At %d: a=%d, b=%d
", i, a[i], b[i]);
    }
}

That to me produced the same results as my earlier experiment program:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <malloc.h>

/* compile with gcc -o test1 -fopenmp test1.c */

int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
    int i = 0;
    int size = 20;
    int* a = (int*) calloc(size, sizeof(int));
    int* b = (int*) calloc(size, sizeof(int));

    for ( i = 0; i < size; i++ )
    {
        a[i] = i;
        b[i] = size-i;
        printf("[BEFORE] At %d: a=%d, b=%d
", i, a[i], b[i]);
    }

    #pragma omp parallel for shared(a,b) private(i)
    for ( i = 0; i < size; i++ )
    {
        a[i] = 5*a[i]+2*b[i]-2*i;
        b[i] = 4*a[i]-b[i]+i;
    }

    for ( i = 0; i < size; i++ )
    {
        printf("[AFTER] At %d: a=%d, b=%d
", i, a[i], b[i]);
    }
}

At a guess I'd say because OpenMP can't deduce the size of the array it can't be private - only compile-time arrays can be done this way. I get segfaults when I try to private a dynamically allocated array, presumably because of access violations. Allocating the array on each thread as if you'd written this using pthreads makes sense and solves the issue.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...