UPDATED (20200226)
There were a couple comments that a CLR/regex solution could be faster than the ngram8k solution I posted. I've heard this for six years but every single time, without exception, the test harness tells a different story. I already posted in the earlier comments instructions to get the Microsoft? MDQ family of CLR Regex running in just a few minutes. They were developed, tested and tuned by Microsoft and ship with Master Data Services/Data Quality Services. I've used them for years, they're good.
RegexReplace/RegexSplit vs PatExtract8k/DigitsOnlyEE: 1,000,000 rows
Obviously you don't want functions in your WHEREclause but, since my Regex is rusty AF, I needed to. To level the playing field I did the same with DigitsOnlyEE in the N-Gram solution's WHERE clause.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DBCC FREEPROCCACHE WITH NO_INFOMSGS;
DBCC DROPCLEANBUFFERS WITH NO_INFOMSGS;
SET STATISTICS TIME ON;
DECLARE
@newData BIT = 0,
@string VARCHAR(8000) = '1) Call back from +79005346546, Conversation started<br>Phone: +79005346546<br>Called twice Came from google.com<br>IP: 77.106.46.202 the web page address is xxx.com utm_medium: cpc<br>utm_campaign: 32587871<br>utm_content: 5283041 79005346546 ',
@pattern VARCHAR(50) = '[^0-9()+.-]',
@srchLen INT = 11;
IF @newData = 1
BEGIN
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#strings','U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #strings;
SELECT
StringId = IDENTITY(INT,1,1),
String = REPLICATE(@string,ABS(CHECKSUM(NEWID())%3)+1)
INTO #strings
FROM dbo.rangeAB(1,1000000,1,1) AS r;
END
PRINT CHAR(10)+'Regex/CLR version Serial'+CHAR(10)+REPLICATE('-',90);
SELECT regex.NewString
FROM #strings AS s
CROSS APPLY
(
SELECT STRING_AGG(clr.RegexReplace(f.Token,'[^0-9]','',0),' ')
FROM clr.RegexSplit(s.string,@pattern,N'[0-9()+.-]',0) AS f
WHERE f.IsValid = 1
AND LEN(clr.RegexReplace(f.Token,'[^0-9]','',0)) = @srchLen
) AS regex(NewString);
PRINT CHAR(10)+'NGrams version Serial'+CHAR(10)+REPLICATE('-',90);
SELECT ngramsStuff.NewString
FROM #strings AS s
CROSS APPLY
(
SELECT STRING_AGG(ee.digitsOnly,' ')
FROM samd.patExtract8K(@string,@pattern) AS pe
CROSS APPLY samd.digitsOnlyEE(pe.item) AS ee
WHERE LEN(ee.digitsOnly) = @srchLen
) AS ngramsStuff(NewString)
OPTION (MAXDOP 1);
SET STATISTICS TIME OFF;
GO
Test Results
Regex/CLR version Serial
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL Server Execution Times: CPU time = 19918 ms, elapsed time = 12355 ms.
NGrams version Serial
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL Server Execution Times: CPU time = 844 ms, elapsed time = 971 ms.
NGrams8k is very fast, does not require you to compile a new assembly, learn a new programming language, Enable CLR functions, etc... No issues with garbage collection. Even the CLR N-GRAMs function that ships with MDS/DQS can't touch NGrams8k for performance (see the comments under my article).
END OF UPDATE
First grab a copy of ngrams8k and use it to build PatExtract8k (DDL below at the bottom of this post.) Next a quick warm-up:
DECLARE
@string VARCHAR(8000) = 'Call me later at 222-3333 or tomorrow at 312.555.2222,
(313)555-6789, or at 1+800-555-4444 before noon. Thanks!',
@pattern VARCHAR(50) = '%[^0-9()+.-]%';
SELECT pe.itemNumber, pe.itemIndex, pe.itemLength, pe.item
FROM samd.patExtract8K(@string,@pattern) AS pe
WHERE pe.itemLength > 1;
Returns:
ItemNumber ItemIndex ItemLength Item
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------------
1 18 8 222-3333
2 42 12 312.555.2222
3 91 13 (313)555-6789
4 112 14 1+800-555-4444
Note that the function returns the matched pattern, position in the string, Item Length and the item. The first three attributes can be leveraged for further processing which brings us to your post. Note my comments:
-- First for some easily consumable sample data.
DECLARE @things TABLE (StringId INT IDENTITY, String VARCHAR(8000));
INSERT @things (String)
VALUES
('Call back from +79005346546, Conversation started<br>Phone: +79005346546<br>Called twice Came from google.com<br>IP: 77.106.46.202 the web page address is xxx.com utm_medium: cpc<br>utm_campaign: 32587871<br>utm_content: 5283041 79005346546 '),
('John Smith'),
('xxx@yyy.com'),
('John Smith 8 999 888 77 77');
DECLARE @SrchLen INT = 11;
SELECT
StringId = t.StringId,
ItemIndex = pe.itemIndex,
ItemLength = @SrchLen,
Item = i2.Item
FROM @things AS t
CROSS APPLY samd.patExtract8K(t.String,'[^0-9 ]') AS pe
CROSS APPLY (VALUES(PATINDEX('%'+REPLICATE('[0-9]',@SrchLen), pe.item))) AS i(Idx)
CROSS APPLY (VALUES(SUBSTRING(pe.Item,NULLIF(i.Idx,0),11))) AS ns(NewString)
CROSS APPLY (VALUES(ISNULL(ns.NewString, REPLACE(pe.item,' ','')))) AS i2(Item)
WHERE pe.itemLength >= @SrchLen;
Returns:
StringId ItemIndex ItemLength Item
----------- -------------------- ----------- -----------
1 17 11 79005346546
1 62 11 79005346546
1 221 11 79005346546
4 11 11 89998887777
Next we can handle outer rows like so and row-to-column concatenation like this:
WITH t AS
(
SELECT i2.Item, t.StringId
FROM @things AS t
CROSS APPLY samd.patExtract8K(t.String,'[^0-9 ]') AS pe
CROSS APPLY (VALUES(PATINDEX('%'+REPLICATE('[0-9]',@SrchLen), pe.item))) AS i(Idx)
CROSS APPLY (VALUES(SUBSTRING(pe.Item,NULLIF(i.Idx,0),11))) AS ns(NewString)
CROSS APPLY (VALUES(ISNULL(ns.NewString, REPLACE(pe.item,' ','')))) AS i2(Item)
WHERE pe.itemLength >= @SrchLen
)
SELECT
StringId = t2.StringId,
NewString = ISNULL((
SELECT t.item+' '
FROM t
WHERE t.StringId = t2.StringId
FOR XML PATH('')),'')
FROM @things AS t2
LEFT JOIN t AS t1 ON t2.StringId = t1.StringId
GROUP BY t2.StringId;
Returns:
StringId NewString
--------- --------------------------------------
1 79005346546 79005346546 79005346546
2
3
4 89998887777
I wish I had a little more time for additional details but this took a little longer then planned. Any questions welcome.
Patextract:
CREATE FUNCTION samd.patExtract8K
(
@string VARCHAR(8000),
@pattern VARCHAR(50)
)
/*****************************************************************************************
[Description]:
This can be considered a T-SQL inline table valued function (iTVF) equivalent of
Microsoft's mdq.RegexExtract except that:
1. It includes each matching substring's position in the string
2. It accepts varchar(8000) instead of nvarchar(4000) for the input string, varchar(50)
instead of nvarchar(4000) for the pattern
3. The mask parameter is not required and therefore does not exist.
4. You have specify what text we're searching for as an exclusion; e.g. for numeric
characters you should search for '[^0-9]' instead of '[0-9]'.
5. There is is no parameter for naming a "capture group". Using the variable below, both
the following queries will return the same result:
DECLARE @string nvarchar(4000) = N'123 Main Street';
SELECT item FROM samd.patExtract8K(@string, '[^0-9]');
SELECT clr.RegexExtract(@string, N'(?<number>(d+))(?<street>(.*))', N'number', 1);
Alternatively, you can think of patExtract8K as Chris Morris' PatternSplitCM (found here:
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/String+Manipulation/94365/) but only returns the
rows where [matched]=0. The key benefit of is that it performs substantially better
because you are only returning the number of rows required instead of returning twice as
many rows then filtering out half of them. Furthermore, because we're
The following two sets of queries return the same result:
DECLARE @string varchar(100) = 'xx123xx555xx999';
BEGIN
-- QUERY #1
-- patExtract8K
SELECT ps.itemNumber, ps.item
FROM samd.patExtract8K(@string, '[^0-9]') ps;
-- patternSplitCM
SELECT itemNumber = row_number() over (order by ps.itemNumber), ps.item
FROM dbo.patternSplitCM(@string, '[^0-9]') ps
WHERE [matched] = 0;
-- QUERY #2
SELECT ps.itemNumber, ps.item
FROM samd.patExtract8K(@string, '[0-9]') ps;
SELECT itemNumber = row_number() over (order by itemNumber), item
FROM dbo.patternSplitCM(@string, '[0-9]')
WHERE [matched] = 0;
END;
[Compatibility]:
SQL Server 2008+
[Syntax]:
--===== Autonomous
SELECT pe.ItemNumber, pe.ItemIndex, pe.ItemLength, pe.Item
FROM samd.patExtract8K(@string,@pattern) pe;
--===== Against a table using APPLY
SELECT t.someString, pe.ItemIndex, pe.ItemLength, pe.Item
FROM samd.SomeTable t
CROSS APPLY samd.patExtract8K(t.someString, @pattern) pe;
[Parameters]:
@string = varchar(8000); the input string
@searchString = varchar(50); pattern to search for
[Returns]:
itemNumber = bigint; the instance or ordinal position of the matched substring
itemIndex = bigint; the location of the matched substring inside the input string
itemLength = int; the length of the matched substring
item = varchar(8000); the returned text
[Developer Notes]:
1. Requires NGrams8k
2. patExtract8K does not return any rows on NULL or empty strings. Consider using
OUTER APPLY or append the function with the code below to force the function to return
a row on emply or NULL inputs:
UNION ALL SELECT 1, 0, NULL, @string WHERE nullif(@string,'') IS NULL;
3. patExtract8K is not case sensitive; use a case sensitive collation for
case-sensitive comparisons
4. patExtract8K is deterministic. For more about deterministic functions see:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178091.aspx
5. patExtract8K performs substantially better with a parallel execution plan, often
2-3 times faster. For queries that leverage patextract8K that are not getting a
parallel exeution plan you should consider performance testing using Traceflag 8649
in Development environments and Adam Machanic's make_parallel in production.
[Examples]:
--===== (1) Basic extact all groups of numbers:
WITH temp(id, txt) as
(
SELECT * FROM (values
(1, 'hello 123 fff 1234567 and today;""o999999999 tester 44444444444444 done'),
(2, 'syat 123 ff tyui( 1234567 and today 999999999 tester 777777 done'),
(3, '&**OOOOO=+ + + // ==?76543// and today !!222222\ester{}))22222444 done'))t(x,xx)
)
SELECT
[temp.id] = t.id,
pe.itemNumber,
pe.itemIndex,
pe.itemLength,
pe.item
FROM temp AS t
CROSS APPLY samd.patExtract8K(t.txt, '[^0-9]') AS pe;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revision History:
Rev 00 - 20170801 - Initial Development - Alan Bu
