Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
552 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

concurrency - Is there any way to atomically update two collections in MongoDB?

I have a collection of messages:

{
    messageid: ObjectId
    userid: ObjectId
    message: string
    isread: true|false
}

and a collection of message counts per user:

{
    userid: ObjectId
    total: int
    unread: int
}

When I delete a message from "messages" collection, I also need to decrease "total" in "counts" collection, and conditionally (if "messages.isread" == false) decrease "unread" field as well.

For that I need to first retrieve teh message, check its "isread" field, and then update the counts. There is a possibility that the message will be marked as read in between those actions, then I will decrease "unread" counts incorrectly.

Is there a way to conditionally change something in one collection based on results of other collection in one shot?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

There are lots of answers here, but I want to fill in all of the blanks here:

Is there any way to atomically update two collections in MongoDB?

No. Atomic update of two collections is effectively a transaction. MongoDB does not support transactions across collections or even within a collection.

MongoDB provides several modifiers that are atomic on a single document. So you can increment several different variables at once ($inc). Though there are some limitations here, you cannot perform two different operations on a single property.

Is there a way to conditionally change something in one collection based on results of other collection in one shot?

There are some documents here on atomic updates in general. However, what you really need is a queue and some form of two-phase commit or you need triggers.

Triggers have not yet been implemented, so it's not really an option in your case.

There is a possibility that the message will be marked as read in between those actions, then I will decrease "unread" counts incorrectly.

At this point, you have a couple of different strategies for making this behave with some level of consistency. Frankly, based on your description, you may want to investigate building a simple queue that updates your totals.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

56.9k users

...