Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
958 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

scikit learn - Is there easy way to grid search without cross validation in python?

There is absolutely helpful class GridSearchCV in scikit-learn to do grid search and cross validation, but I don't want to do cross validataion. I want to do grid search without cross validation and use whole data to train. To be more specific, I need to evaluate my model made by RandomForestClassifier with "oob score" during grid search. Is there easy way to do it? or should I make a class by myself?

The points are

  • I'd like to do grid search with easy way.
  • I don't want to do cross validation.
  • I need to use whole data to train.(don't want to separate to train data and test data)
  • I need to use oob score to evaluate during grid search.
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

I would really advise against using OOB to evaluate a model, but it is useful to know how to run a grid search outside of GridSearchCV() (I frequently do this so I can save the CV predictions from the best grid for easy model stacking). I think the easiest way is to create your grid of parameters via ParameterGrid() and then just loop through every set of params. For example assuming you have a grid dict, named "grid", and RF model object, named "rf", then you can do something like this:

for g in ParameterGrid(grid):
    rf.set_params(**g)
    rf.fit(X,y)
    # save if best
    if rf.oob_score_ > best_score:
        best_score = rf.oob_score_
        best_grid = g

print "OOB: %0.5f" % best_score 
print "Grid:", best_grid

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...