Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
510 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

try catch - Nested try statements in python?

Is there a nicer way of doing the following:

try:
    a.method1()
except AttributeError:
    try:
        a.method2()
    except AttributeError:
        try:
            a.method3()
        except AttributeError:
            raise

It looks pretty nasty and I'd rather not do:

if hasattr(a, 'method1'):
    a.method1()
else if hasattr(a, 'method2'):
    a.method2()
else if hasattr(a, 'method3'):
    a.method3()
else:
    raise AttributeError

to maintain maximum efficiency.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

A slight change to the second looks pretty nice and simple. I really doubt you'll notice any performance difference between the two, and this is a bit nicer than a nested try/excepts

def something(a):
    for methodname in ['method1', 'method2', 'method3']:
        try:
            m = getattr(a, methodname)
        except AttributeError:
            pass
        else:
            return m()
    raise AttributeError

The other very readable way is to do..

def something(a):
    try:
        return a.method1()
    except:
        pass

    try:
        return a.method2()
    except:
        pass

    try:
        return a.method3()
    except:
        pass

    raise AttributeError

While long, it's very obvious what the function is doing.. Performance really shouldn't be an issue (if a few try/except statements slow your script down noticeably, there is probably a bigger issue with the script structure)


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

56.9k users

...