Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
736 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

if statement - I encountered "unary operator expected" in a Bash script

In my Bash script, I have a function to return 0 or 1 (true or false) for the later main function's condition.

function1 () {
    if [[ "${1}" =~ "^ ...some regexp... $" ]] ; then
        return 1
    else
        return 0
    fi
}

Then in my main function:

main () {
    for arg in ${@} ; do
        if [ function1 ${arg} ] ; then
            ...
        elif [ ... ] ; then
            ...
        fi
    done
}

However, when I ran this script it always gave me an error message:

[: function1: unary operator expected

How can I fix this?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

You are making the common mistake of assuming that [ is part of the if command's syntax. It is not; the syntax of if is simply

if command; then
    ... things which should happen if command's result code was 0
else
    ... things which should happen otherwise
fi

One of the common commands we use is [ which is an alias for the command test. It is a simple command for comparing strings, numbers, and files. It accepts a fairly narrow combination of arguments, and tends to generate confusing and misleading error messages if you don't pass it the expected arguments. (Or rather, the error messages are adequate and helpful once you get used to it, but they are easily misunderstood if you're not used.)

In your main function, the call to [ appears misplaced. ?You probably mean

if function "$arg"; then
    ...
elif ... ; then ...

By the way, for good measure, you should also always quote your strings. Use "$1" not $1, and "$arg" instead of $arg.

The historical reasons for test as a general kitchen sink of stuff the authors didn't want to make part of the syntax of if is one of the less attractive designs of the original Bourne shell. Bash and zsh offer alternatives which are less unwieldy (like the [[ double brackets in bash, which you use in your function1 definition), and of course, POSIX test is a lot more well-tempered than the original creation from Bell Labs.

As an additional clarification, your function can be simplified to just

function1 () {
    ! [[ "$1" =~ "^ ...some regexp... $" ]]
}

That is, perform the test with [[ and reverse its result code. (The "normal" case would be to return 0 for success, but maybe you are attempting to verify that the string doesn't match?)


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...