Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
298 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

sql - Behaviour of NOT LIKE with NULL values

I want to fetch all columns of a table except of columns of type serial. The closest query to this problem I was able to come up with this one:

SELECT column_name FROM information_schema.columns
WHERE table_name = 'table1' AND column_default NOT LIKE 'nextval%'

But the problem is its also excluding/filtering rows having empty values for column_default.I don't know why the behaviour of Postgres is like this. So I had to change my query to something like this:

SELECT column_name FROM information_schema.columns
WHERE table_name = 'table1'
AND ( column_default IS NULL OR column_default NOT LIKE 'nextval%')

Any better suggestions or rationale behind this are welcome.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

About NULL

'anything' NOT LIKE NULL yields NULL, not TRUE.
And only TRUE qualifies for filter expressions in a WHERE clause.

Most functions return NULL on NULL input (there are exceptions). That's the nature of NULL in any proper RDBMS.

If you desire a single expression, you could use:

AND   (column_default LIKE 'nextval%')  IS NOT TRUE;

That's hardly shorter or faster, though. Details in the manual.

Proper query

Your query is still unreliable. A table name alone is not unique in a Postgres database, you need to specify the schema name in addition or rely on the current search_path to find the first match in it:

Related:

SELECT column_name
FROM   information_schema.columns
WHERE  table_name = 'hstore1'
AND    table_schema = 'public'   -- your schema
AND   (column_default IS NULL OR
       column_default NOT LIKE 'nextval%');

Better, but still not bullet-proof. A column default starting with 'nextval' does not make a serial, yet. See:

To be sure, check whether the sequence in use is "owned" by the column with pg_get_serial_sequence(table_name, column_name).

I rarely use the information schema myself. Those slow, bloated views guarantee portability across major versions - and aim at portability to other standard-compliant RDBMS. But too much is incompatible anyway. Oracle does not even implement the information schema (as of 2015).

Also, useful Postgres-specific columns are missing in the information schema. For this case I might query the the system catalogs like this:

SELECT *
FROM   pg_catalog.pg_attribute a
WHERE  attrelid = 'table1'::regclass
AND    NOT attisdropped   -- no dropped (dead) columns
AND    attnum > 0         -- no system columns
AND   NOT EXISTS (
   SELECT FROM pg_catalog.pg_attrdef d
   WHERE  (d.adrelid, d.adnum) = (a.attrelid, a.attnum)
   AND    d.adsrc LIKE 'nextval%'
   AND    pg_get_serial_sequence(a.attrelid::regclass::text, a.attname) <> ''
   );

Faster and more reliable, but less portable.

The manual:

The catalog pg_attrdef stores column default values. The main information about columns is stored in pg_attribute (see below). Only columns that explicitly specify a default value (when the table is created or the column is added) will have an entry here.

'table1'::regclass uses the search_path to resolve the name, which avoids ambiguity. You can schema-qualify the name to overrule: 'myschema.table1'::regclass.

Related:


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...