Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
648 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

reference - How to convert Option<&T> to Option<T> in the most idiomatic way in Rust?

When using HashMap's get method, I get an Option<&T>, I've encountered it again this time with Option<&String>. I'd like to get an owned value Option<String>. Is this possible without me writing map(|x| x.to_owned())?

I'm just wondering if there's a way to write a blanket implementation for any of the utility traits to achieve that?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Option comes with utility methods for various transformations, which are listed in its documentation. For any T that implements Clone (which String does), Option<&T>::cloned does what you're looking for.

Clone is more specific than ToOwned, so .cloned() isn't an exact match for .map(|x| x.to_owned()). For example, it won't turn an Option<&str> into an Option<String>; for that you will have to stick with map.

Since Rust 1.35, when T is Copy, .copied() does the same thing as .cloned(), but it will fail to compile when T is not Copy. You might use this when you want to be explicit that the clone is cheap.


See also:


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...