Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
386 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

.net - Target 4.5.1 and Any CPU runs as 32 bit on x64, 4.5 runs as 64 bit, Why?

Visual Studio target 4.5.1 and Any CPU runs as 32 bit on x64, but when targeting 4.5 and Any CPU it will run as 64 bit on x64 system. What has changed in 4.5.1 to make it run in WOW mode?

Hope this makes sense...

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Nothing changed in .NET 4.5.1 that affects the bitness of the process.

A very common trap is that programmers pay too much attention to the Platform name. Prominently displayed in the Build + Configuration Manager dialog for example. The name is irrelevant for managed projects. It only matters to the kind of projects that generate code differently based on the Platform selection. C++ projects.

What's worse is that the default Platform name changed between different VS versions. It always used to be AnyCPU. Then it was changed to x86 in VS2010. That caused massive confusion so it was changed back to AnyCPU in VS2012.

The real setting that has an effect is in Project + Properties, Build tab, Platform target setting for the C# IDE. For VS2012 and up also the "Prefer 32-bit" checkbox. Only for the EXE project, it runs first and locks-in the bitness. If you pick x86 (or tick the box) then the CLR is instructed to use the x86 jitter instead of the x64 jitter.

The "Prefer 32-bit" checkbox is turned on by default for a new project. So you already automatically have a mismatch between the Platform name of AnyCPU and the actual bitness of the running process. Oh joy.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...