Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
786 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

function - Sml folding a tree

I am trying to get the product of a tree by using the fold function so far this is what I have. I am confused on how to use the fold method while transversing the tree

datatype 'a bin_tree = Leaf of 'a 
| Node of 'a bin_tree * 'a bin_tree


fun treefold g z Empty = z
| treefold g z (Node (l, x, r)) = g(x, g(treefold g z l, treefold g z r)
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

First, some pointers about what isn't quite in order in your attempt.

  1. The base case of your treefold function matches against the value constructor Empty, but you don't define the bin_tree datatype to include an Empty value constructor.
  2. As John Coleman points out in his comments, you've defined the Node value constructor to take a pair, but in your recursive case you match Node with a triple. Bearing in mind Simon Shine's excellent answer explaining folds over binary trees, we can probably infer the reason for this: your treefold function expects a canonical binary tree (where each node has a value and two branches) but the data structure you defined doesn't implement this structure. I'm not sure what the data structure you've defined is called, despite giving it a good google (though I think I've implemented it before!).
  3. You apply g to z twice, once down the left branch and once down the right branch. This would mean the value passed in to that place will get included in the fold twice for every branch. I don't imagine that's what you intended.

(1) and (2) should both be caught by the type checker as soon as you try to compile or load your code. You should try this, if you haven't already, and make sure you understand the feedback the type checker provides. It is a very valuable tool.

(3) has to do with the nature of the function you intend to write, and it is only out of order if you didn't mean it.

Here's one way to define a fold over the data structure you defined.

structure Tree =
struct
    datatype 'a tree = Leaf of 'a
                     | Node of 'a tree * 'a tree

    fun foldl f x t =
      case t
       of Leaf y => f (x, y)              (* The base case *)
        | Node (treeL, treeR) =>
          let
              val l = foldl f x treeL     (* Recurse down the left branch *)
          in
              foldl f l treeR             (* Recurse down the right branch *)
          end
end

Notice that, having put foldl here in the Tree module, we now how have a function that mirrors the foldl function in the List structure (and elsewhere):

- List.foldl;
val it = fn : ('a * 'b -> 'b) -> 'b -> 'a list -> 'b
- Tree.foldl;
val it = fn : ('a * 'b -> 'a) -> 'a -> 'b bin_tree -> 'a

This would make it easier to parameterize over either lists or trees.

It works like so:

- foldl op+ 0 (Node (Leaf 3, Node (Node (Leaf 1, Leaf 2), Leaf 5)));
val it = 11 : int

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...