Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
950 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

assembly - How do labels and dd declarations work in NASM? What's the C equivalent?

I'm trying to understand what'd be the C equivalent of some nasm idioms like these ones:

%define CONSTANT1 1
%define CONSTANT2 2

1) section name_section data align=N
    v1: dd 1.2345678
    v2: dd 0x12345678
    v3: dd 32767
    v4:
    v5: dd 1.0
    v6:
        dd 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0,
        dd 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0

2) section name_section bss align=N
    v7:
        resd 1

3) global _function_name@0
    section name_section code align=N
    _function_name@0:
        ...

4) global _g_structure1
    global _g_structure2
    section name_section data align=N
    _g_structure1:
        dw 01h
        dw 2
    _g_structure2:
        dd CONSTANT1
        dd CONSTANT2

5) section section_name code align=N
    function_name:
        ...

The nasm documentation here and here didn't clarify too much. Guess my questions are:

  • How dd and similars are interpreted?
  • It seems you can declare N sections of type {code, bss, data} with X bytes alignment, what's the meaning of that in C?
  • There are functions with the @N suffix, what's the meaning of that?
  • global... you declare global labels? in what scope? nasm files?
  • v4: is empty, what does that mean?
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

dd stores a sequence of DWORDS given by the arguments. So dd 1 will store the 4-byte value 0x00000001 at the current location (since it's targeting a little endian architecture, you'll end up with the bytes 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00).

Sections aren't generally exposed directly in C - it's more of a lower level concern handled by compilers, linkers and runtime loaders. So in general your toolchain will handle the proper allocation of your code and data into sections. For example, the compiler will put the actual assembled code into .text sections, and will put statically initialized data into .data sections, and finally will put uninitialized or zero-initialized statically allocated data into .bss sections, and so on. The details aren't really part of C itself and will vary by platform and executable format (for example, not all platforms have the same types of sections).

When using assembly, on the other hand, you need to be a bit more aware of sections. For example, if you have mutable data it is important that it ends up a different section than your code, since you don't want to run into read-only .text sections, or self-modifying-code false positives, etc.

The section alignment is a directive to the runtime loader that tells it the minimum required alignment for the section. You can impact this in your C code using some compiler or platform specific options - e.g. if you request a statically allocated array to have an alignment of 32, then the .data section may be promoted to at least 32-byte alignment. C doesn't have a standard way to actually request such alignment, but you can use platform specific extensions such as posix_memalign, gcc's aligned attribute, or even #pragma pack. C++11 on the other hand has alignas to do this in a standard way.

The @N suffix is a result of stdcall name mangling.

You can declare global labels with the help of the GLOBAL directive in nasm. As Peter point out, this only modifies the attributes of a subsequently declared label, and doesn't actually declare the label itself (which is still done in the usual way). This directive has other format-specific options which let you, for example, declare your exported symbol as a function.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...