python - Find the index of the n'th item in a list

Question

I want to find the index of the n'th occurrence of an item in a list. e.g.,

x=[False,True,True,False,True,False,True,False,False,False,True,False,True]

What is the index of the n'th true? If I wanted the fifth occurrence (4th if zero-indexed), the answer is 10.

I've come up with:

indargs = [ i for i,a in enumerate(x) if a ]
indargs[n]

Note that x.index returns the first occurrence or the first occurrence after some point, and therefore as far as I can tell is not a solution.

There is also a solution in numpy for cases similar to the above, e.g. using cumsum and where, but I'd like to know if there's a numpy-free way to solve the problem.

I'm concerned about performance since I first encountered this while implemented a Sieve of Eratosthenes for a Project Euler problem, but this is a more general question that I have encountered in other situations.

EDIT: I've gotten a lot of great answers, so I decided to do some performance tests. Below are timeit execution times in seconds for lists with len nelements searching for the 4000'th/1000'th True. The lists are random True/False. Source code linked below; it's a touch messy. I used short / modified versions of the posters' names to describe the functions except listcomp, which is the simple list comprehension above.

True Test (100'th True in a list containing True/False)
         nelements      eyquem_occur eyquem_occurrence            graddy            taymon          listcomp       hettinger26         hettinger
             3000:          0.007824          0.031117          0.002144          0.007694          0.026908          0.003563          0.003563
            10000:          0.018424          0.103049          0.002233          0.018063          0.088245          0.003610          0.003769
            50000:          0.078383          0.515265          0.002140          0.078074          0.442630          0.003719          0.003608
           100000:          0.152804          1.054196          0.002129          0.152691          0.903827          0.003741          0.003769
           200000:          0.303084          2.123534          0.002212          0.301918          1.837870          0.003522          0.003601
True Test (1000'th True in a list containing True/False)
         nelements      eyquem_occur eyquem_occurrence            graddy            taymon          listcomp       hettinger26         hettinger
             3000:          0.038461          0.031358          0.024167          0.039277          0.026640          0.035283          0.034482
            10000:          0.049063          0.103241          0.024120          0.049383          0.088688          0.035515          0.034700
            50000:          0.108860          0.516037          0.023956          0.109546          0.442078          0.035269          0.035373
           100000:          0.183568          1.049817          0.024228          0.184406          0.906709          0.035135          0.036027
           200000:          0.333501          2.141629          0.024239          0.333908          1.826397          0.034879          0.036551
True Test (20000'th True in a list containing True/False)
         nelements      eyquem_occur eyquem_occurrence            graddy            taymon          listcomp       hettinger26         hettinger
             3000:          0.004520          0.004439          0.036853          0.004458          0.026900          0.053460          0.053734
            10000:          0.014925          0.014715          0.126084          0.014864          0.088470          0.177792          0.177716
            50000:          0.766154          0.515107          0.499068          0.781289          0.443654          0.707134          0.711072
           100000:          0.837363          1.051426          0.501842          0.862350          0.903189          0.707552          0.706808
           200000:          0.991740          2.124445          0.498408          1.008187          1.839797          0.715844          0.709063
Number Test (750'th 0 in a list containing 0-9)
         nelements      eyquem_occur eyquem_occurrence            graddy            taymon          listcomp       hettinger26         hettinger
             3000:          0.026996          0.026887          0.015494          0.030343          0.022417          0.026557          0.026236
            10000:          0.037887          0.089267          0.015839          0.040519          0.074941          0.026525          0.027057
            50000:          0.097777          0.445236          0.015396          0.101242          0.371496          0.025945          0.026156
           100000:          0.173794          0.905993          0.015409          0.176317          0.762155          0.026215          0.026871
           200000:          0.324930          1.847375          0.015506          0.327957          1.536012          0.027390          0.026657

Hettinger's itertools solution is almost always the best. taymon's and graddy's solutions are next best for most situations, though the list comprehension approach can be better for short arrays when you want the n'th instance such that n is high or lists in which there are fewer than n occurrences. If there's a chance that there are fewer than n occurrences, the initial count check saves time. Also, graddy's is more efficient when searching for numbers instead of True/False... not clear why that is. eyquem's solutions are essentially equivalent to others with slightly more or less overhead; eyquem_occur is approximately the same as taymon's solution, while eyquem_occurrence is similar to listcomp.

Answer 1

The answer from @Taymon using list.index was great.

FWIW, here's a functional approach using the itertools module. It works with any iterable input, not just lists:

>>> from itertools import compress, count, imap, islice
>>> from functools import partial
>>> from operator import eq

>>> def nth_item(n, item, iterable):
        indicies = compress(count(), imap(partial(eq, item), iterable))
        return next(islice(indicies, n, None), -1)

The example is nice because it shows off how to effectively combine Python's functional toolset. Note, that once the pipeline is set-up, there are no trips around Python's eval loop -- everything gets done at C speed, with a tiny memory footprint, with lazy evaluation, with no variable assignments, and with separately testable components. IOW, it is everything functional programmers dream about :-)

Sample run:

>>> x = [False,True,True,False,True,False,True,False,False,False,True,False,True]
>>> nth_item(50, True, x)
-1
>>> nth_item(0, True, x)
1
>>> nth_item(1, True, x)
2
>>> nth_item(2, True, x)
4
>>> nth_item(3, True, x)
6