Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
451 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c - Linux Kernel - why a function's address in System.map is one byte preceding its address as seen in real time?

In linux kernel source code, added this lines in tasklet_action code:

printk("tasklet_action = %p
" , *tasklet_action);
printk("tasklet_action = %p
" , &tasklet_action);
printk("tasklet_action = %p
" , tasklet_action);

In the output I get:

tasklet_action = c03441a1
tasklet_action = c03441a1
tasklet_action = c03441a1

But when searching it in the system.map file the tasklet_action address is at c03441a0 so there is an offset of 1 byte.

  • Why do I have this offset?
  • Is it always an one byte offset?
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

My guess is that you are running on ARM in Thumb mode, or on some other architecture that uses the bottom bit of the function pointer to indicate which mode to run in.

If so, the answer is that your function really is located at the address in the system.map.

The value you get at run time is the location and the mode.

Instructions, on these kinds of architectures, always must be 2- or 4-byte aligned, which would leave the bottom bit always zero. When the architecture grew an extra mode the designers made use of the 'wasted' bit to encode the mode. It's clever, but confusing, and not just for you: a lot of software, like debuggers, broke in many nasty ways when this was first invented.

The concept is particularly confusing for x86 programmers who are used to variable-length instructions with any random alignment.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

57.0k users

...