Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
474 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

r - Efficient apply or mapply for multiple matrix arguments by row

I have two matrices that I want to apply a function to, by rows:

matrixA
           GSM83009  GSM83037  GSM83002  GSM83029  GSM83041
100001_at  5.873321  5.416164  3.512227  6.064150  3.713696
100005_at  5.807870  6.810829  6.105804  6.644000  6.142413
100006_at  2.757023  4.144046  1.622930  1.831877  3.694880

matrixB
          GSM82939 GSM82940 GSM82974 GSM82975
100001_at 3.673556 2.372952 3.228049 3.555816
100005_at 6.916954 6.909533 6.928252 7.003377
100006_at 4.277985 4.856986 3.670161 4.075533

I've found several similar questions, but not a whole lot of answers: mapply for matrices, Multi matrix row-wise mapply?. The code I have now splits the matrices by row into lists, but having to split it makes it rather slow and not much faster than a for loop, considering I have almost 9000 rows in each matrix:

scores <- mapply(t.test.stat, split(matrixA, row(matrixA)), split(matrixB, row(matrixB)))

The function itself is very simple, just finding the t-value:

t.test.stat <- function(x, y)
{
    return( (mean(x) - mean(y)) / sqrt(var(x)/length(x) + var(y)/length(y)) )
}
See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

Splitting the matrices isn't the biggest contributor to evaluation time.

set.seed(21)
matrixA <- matrix(rnorm(5 * 9000), nrow = 9000)
matrixB <- matrix(rnorm(4 * 9000), nrow = 9000)

system.time( scores <- mapply(t.test.stat,
    split(matrixA, row(matrixA)), split(matrixB, row(matrixB))) )
#    user  system elapsed 
#    1.57    0.00    1.58 
smA <- split(matrixA, row(matrixA))
smB <- split(matrixB, row(matrixB))
system.time( scores <- mapply(t.test.stat, smA, smB) )
#    user  system elapsed 
#    1.14    0.00    1.14 

Look at the output from Rprof to see that most of the time is--not surprisingly--spent evaluating t.test.stat (mean, var, etc.). Basically, there's quite a bit of overhead from function calls.

Rprof()
scores <- mapply(t.test.stat, smA, smB)
Rprof(NULL)
summaryRprof()

You may be able to find faster generalized solutions, but none will approach the speed of the vectorized solution below.

Since your function is simple, you can take advantage of the vectorized rowMeans function to do this almost instantaneously (though it's a bit messy):

system.time({
ncA <- NCOL(matrixA)
ncB <- NCOL(matrixB)
ans <- (rowMeans(matrixA)-rowMeans(matrixB)) /
  sqrt( rowMeans((matrixA-rowMeans(matrixA))^2)*(ncA/(ncA-1))/ncA +
        rowMeans((matrixB-rowMeans(matrixB))^2)*(ncB/(ncB-1))/ncB )
})
#    user  system elapsed 
#      0       0       0 
head(ans)
# [1]  0.8272511 -1.0965269  0.9862844 -0.6026452 -0.2477661  1.1896181

UPDATE
Here's a "cleaner" version using a rowVars function:

rowVars <- function(x, na.rm=FALSE, dims=1L) {
  rowMeans((x-rowMeans(x, na.rm, dims))^2, na.rm, dims)*(NCOL(x)/(NCOL(x)-1))
}
ans <- (rowMeans(matrixA)-rowMeans(matrixB)) /
  sqrt( rowVars(matrixA)/NCOL(matrixA) + rowVars(matrixB)/NCOL(matrixB) )

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...