Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
573 views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

c - Performance of fwrite and write size

I'm writing out a large numerical 2 dimensional array to a binary file (final size ~75 MB).

I'm doing this on a linux system. First, is there a better method or syscall other than fwrite to write the file as fast as possible?

Second, if I should use fwrite, then should I just write the whole file as 1 contiguous line?

fwrite( buf, sizeof(float), 6700*6700, fp );

or write it as a series of chunks

fwrite( buf, sizeof(float), 8192, fp );
fwrite( *(buf+8192), sizeof(float), 8192, fp );
....

If I should chunk the writing, how big should each chunk be?

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

I agree with miked and Jerome for the most part, but... only for a modern OS. If you are working embedded on a flash file system, there are some major exceptions. In this environment, if you suspect fwrite(), invest in a quick test using write() with large blocks.

Today, I found a 4x speed improvement moving to write(). This was due to a posix layer in the embedded OS that transcribed fwrite()s into fputc()s... a SYNC'd underlying flash file just trashes in this case. write() was implemented by routines far closer to the OS (Nucleus) in which the block writes were not broken into bytes.

just saying... if you question the two variants, probably best to just try'em out.


与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

...