Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

Categories

0 votes
1.7k views
in Technique[技术] by (71.8m points)

.net - automapper - ignore mapping if property type is different with same property name - C#

How can I ignore mapping if property type is different with same property name? By default it's throwing error.

Mapper.CreateMap<EntityAttribute, LeadManagementService.LeadEntityAttribute>();

Model = Mapper.Map<EntityAttribute, LeadManagementService.LeadEntityAttribute>(EntityAttribute);

I know a way to specify the property name to ignore but that's not what I want.

  .ForMember(d=>d.Field, m=>m.Ignore());

Because in the future I might add new properties. So i need to ignore mapping for all properties with different data types.

See Question&Answers more detail:os

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
Welcome To Ask or Share your Answers For Others

1 Reply

0 votes
by (71.8m points)

You can use ForAllMembers() to setup the appropriate mapping condition:

Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
{
    cfg.CreateMap<EntityAttribute, LeadEntityAttribute>().ForAllMembers(memberConf =>
    {
        memberConf.Condition((ResolutionContext cond) => cond.DestinationType == cond.SourceType);
    });
}

You can also apply it globally using ForAllMaps():

Mapper.Initialize(cfg =>
{
    // register your maps here
    cfg.CreateMap<A, B>();

    cfg.ForAllMaps((typeMap, mappingExpr) =>
    {
        var ignoredPropMaps = typeMap.GetPropertyMaps();

        foreach (var map in ignoredPropMaps)
        {
            var sourcePropInfo = map.SourceMember as PropertyInfo;
            if (sourcePropInfo == null) continue;

            if (sourcePropInfo.PropertyType != map.DestinationPropertyType)
                map.Ignore();
        }
    });
});

与恶龙缠斗过久,自身亦成为恶龙;凝视深渊过久,深渊将回以凝视…
OGeek|极客中国-欢迎来到极客的世界,一个免费开放的程序员编程交流平台!开放,进步,分享!让技术改变生活,让极客改变未来! Welcome to OGeek Q&A Community for programmer and developer-Open, Learning and Share
Click Here to Ask a Question

1.4m articles

1.4m replys

5 comments

56.7k users

...